A Great Hoax in the Great Pyramid of Egypt? | Ancient Architects

A Great Hoax in the Great Pyramid of Egypt? | Ancient Architects

Ancient Architects

4 месяца назад

121,693 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@AncientArchitects
@AncientArchitects - 11.03.2024 21:15

I had to cut out the clip from the Joe Rogan podcast at around 57 minutes as they ‘demonetised’ the video because I used a 20 second clip in context… Very lame. This was also done manually their end, not automatically… Double lame.

Ответить
@alanpaschoal7299
@alanpaschoal7299 - 02.06.2024 03:08

Yes, please make a video about others evidences of Kufu been the builder! Great video btw! Been following for many years now. Still get excited every new video. Thank you.

Ответить
@j.c.3800
@j.c.3800 - 01.06.2024 18:43

Why would "workers" write his name all over the inside?

Ответить
@LiveFreeOrDie2A
@LiveFreeOrDie2A - 01.06.2024 14:45

Thank God for the gunpowder archaeologists doing what little real exploration has actually been done. Now for decades we’ve been stuck with Egyptologists who are content to play guessing games and paddy cake in perpetuity

Ответить
@grizzlybearzzz2824
@grizzlybearzzz2824 - 29.05.2024 11:50

Zahi Hawass wrote them lol 😂

Ответить
@caroltenge5147
@caroltenge5147 - 27.05.2024 22:18

Graffiti from the saucer people who built the pyramids.

Ответить
@Bart-Did-it
@Bart-Did-it - 25.05.2024 01:14

Has it been tested for what the red is and how old the ink is etc by Egypt ? Is it 5000 years old or not.

Ответить
@anngeorge7828
@anngeorge7828 - 23.05.2024 02:22

That is just scribbles. Why wouldn't the name of the builder etched in stone??

Ответить
@johncrookes1197
@johncrookes1197 - 22.05.2024 19:33

Hes gone very mainstream...the two amatuers were chased around europe by hawass to stop them carbon dates coming out. Hawass does EVERYTHING he can to stop the fact that blacks built the pyramids. The dogons. Quite well known now but hawass tries his hardest to hide the fact that his ancestors actually inherited the egyptian culture from a much earlier pre deluvian culture. Itll come out soon, egyptian archaeologists are even fed up of him

Ответить
@johncrookes1197
@johncrookes1197 - 22.05.2024 18:48

Hold on!! I didnt realize there are red oaker marks in the relieving chambers?!?! Wtf why havent we carbon dated them??????

Ответить
@johncrookes1197
@johncrookes1197 - 22.05.2024 18:37

There are two ways to date the great pyramid perfectly.

1. Take a sample of the red paint from the strange glyphs found behind the door up the queens chamber shaft. That 100% would date the pyramid.

2. Lift one the of blocks up on the outside of the pyramid and do luminescence dating.

I cant be the only one that knows this.....why isnt it being done? Itll answer the question.

Ответить
@duru2882
@duru2882 - 18.05.2024 14:22

What gets me, is Vyse found these marks on his last day, in spaces that had already been found and the marks not recorded before hand!!! Vyse finds the marks when he is alone on his last day, last hour, my guess he needed a win, now he can go down in history as the “finder” of the origin of The Great Pyramid of Giza!!! A very curious motivation, at that point he was allowed more funding from the wealthy sponsors of his expedition!!!

Ответить
@ausgepicht
@ausgepicht - 17.05.2024 03:41

I have a hard time understanding how the cartouche is "hard evidence" that Khufu built the pyramid. It's not even soft evidence, it's not evidence of anything. It wouldn't hold up in a court of law, science journal, or 6th grade debate.

"There's a cartouche graffiti of Khufu in the pyramid therefore he had it built." Is an even greater leap of logic than the pyramidiot claims that aliens built them. The gap in logic is as monumental and unscientific as one can get. I feel like I'm living in the Twilight Zone when people say that with straight faces.

This has no bearing on whether Khufu built the pyramid or not and doesn't incriminate Vyse or vindicate him - though I am of the mindset that he didn't make the graffiti.

Ответить
@noktumwhatever753
@noktumwhatever753 - 08.05.2024 16:59

Who "discovered" it is irrelevant to the dating of it. If I use a sharpie to write my name on the statue of liberty, do you suppose a culture thousands of years from now will believe it was a statue of me?

Ответить
@crazyedo9979
@crazyedo9979 - 08.05.2024 15:39

When I find a beer cap in the ruins of a castle it is obvious that the brewery build the castle.😁

Ответить
@vanzikky
@vanzikky - 06.05.2024 18:36

Khufu plastered his name over anything in reach so why not into the pyramids. His style would have been more to chisel it in 3 m high hieroglyphs on the pyramid walls. What about the other pyramids? Anything found there?

Ответить
@stephensteve4546
@stephensteve4546 - 05.05.2024 20:00

Just carbon date it and be done with the speculation already, jeez 🤷

Ответить
@mikethomp1440
@mikethomp1440 - 05.05.2024 14:19

Graffiti is just that, graffiti. How you can choose to use it to base the age of anything is preposterous. It can be applied at anytime during the history of this structure and it is disingenuous of you or anyone to use it solely for dating the age of it. And you know it. And let me guess, you still contend it was built to be a tomb, right? What a tool you are pal.

Ответить
@noobsaibot5285
@noobsaibot5285 - 04.05.2024 17:06

Interesting that Khufu didn't display his name or inscribe anything anywhere in the pyramid.
Like a monument and/or altar.

Ответить
@russelbrown6275
@russelbrown6275 - 03.05.2024 18:07

That cartouche has been proven a fake because it doesn’t annotate Khufu’s name properly

Ответить
@kami-tubermrshinmaru1261
@kami-tubermrshinmaru1261 - 03.05.2024 14:24

Graffiti survived duizend of years but since its discovery it already faded away😅

Ответить
@acidrock9935
@acidrock9935 - 03.05.2024 13:16

I think that the grapheti is real but it is something that if it was deserved, it wouldn't be necessary. Kufu wouldn't need to put his signature all over it unless he was worried that he would need to convince people of his authentic creation. He wouldn't feel the need to do this unless there would be a question of who built it. I think that he might have modified and rebuilt or added on to this structure. I believe that the Sphinx was originally something else as well, and that he modified it to the simblance of his own face.

Ответить
@digidalethenagatuhoefromra8047
@digidalethenagatuhoefromra8047 - 02.05.2024 09:42

it really doesn't matter these hand painted cartoshes are a very armature compared to the blocks could never have been built my khufu or any other king from that time period , Looking at the construction methods and the sudden appearance of this clearly forged , This can be examined by using the atomic spectrometer to analyse the paint used. It is impossible to make this without asking the question why not every stone and the desiteful attitude of modern archaeology and it claims, and destructive methods, are most certainly a questionable affair. My personal claim is the logic behind every discovery that is found is void of understanding the even modern block building techniques can not challenge this extraordinary building methods which have shaped stones , Stones precisely cut to a one thousands of a millimetre precision, not to mention the weight and mo scale density of red granite blocks, An oscillation ultrasound resonator something Egyptologists have not mentioned due to there lack of understanding that the pre monolithic builders from the younger Dryas used modern machining tools and were far more advanced than we are today,

Ответить
@bdhaliwal24
@bdhaliwal24 - 02.05.2024 08:25

This sets the standard on how to methodically respond to all the nonsense

Ответить
@effu9375
@effu9375 - 30.04.2024 12:39

Why was it okay for the archeologist to write their name on the pyramid??????

Ответить
@funkmobb9368
@funkmobb9368 - 30.04.2024 08:17

Ink doesn’t last 5000 years off of brush stroke . Ever

Ответить
@chrismcmullen4313
@chrismcmullen4313 - 29.04.2024 18:43

Utter rubbish. First of all it was not aliens but native earthlings who were not entirely human. The primary fact that is ignored is that the vast majority of human history is heavily intertwined with the supernatural... plus the idea that rich people endeavored to conceal that fact for centuries to seek thier own advantage by sequesterstering accurate historical knowledge. Funding motivations are not all thats at issue. The thing never discussed is that the colonel may have been a money agent from the get go trying to suppress a supernatural storyline. If it was typical for workers to make thier mark i would think it would have been more than a just a few reference points. It would have been everywhere

Ответить
@nicholaskonwest4697
@nicholaskonwest4697 - 28.04.2024 07:52

The research is just impeccable. Really great content.

Ответить
@joeceonnia1954
@joeceonnia1954 - 23.04.2024 22:12

I believe that the signature of KOKO is correct, he was the third guy from the left of the stone setters, and had nothing to do with kudu.

Ответить
@selfdestrukc5757
@selfdestrukc5757 - 23.04.2024 10:24

I’m not casting doubt that Kufu built the pyramid, I would like to know why put so much time into something to leave behind? I have to think no one will ever know why such a HUGE structure was built just to sit empty. They built so many magnificent structures that all have a purpose with magnificent paintings and aww inspiring art, and the one thing that stands above all of them that stands apart from all the rest. The biggest undertaking of them all just seems to have no real purpose or meaning. No body no nothing just empty until someone found a way in. It’s mind blowing and yet it captivates the hearts and minds of so many. Maybe that’s why it was built, I don’t know, but it definitely leaves so many questions and so little solid answers. Thank you for your hard work and dedication to explaining the past. Love your channel.

Ответить
@otterwoodman864
@otterwoodman864 - 22.04.2024 18:47

When Kufu looked at the pyramid in AWWW he saw it in the same context we do Now as an Ancient Enigma of geometric perfection and Absolutely No idea how such a thing was accomplished as many had and would try to top or even mirror it and failed to come close.

Ответить
@mrliberty8468
@mrliberty8468 - 21.04.2024 22:07

Didn't someone flake some off and have it dated without consent one time.

Ответить
@ModelShips
@ModelShips - 21.04.2024 19:04

Can you tell us where can we see the virtual imagages of the chamber that you used on the video?

Ответить
@eduardom.8766
@eduardom.8766 - 19.04.2024 08:40

lol, pretty sure Graham just claimed the graffiti could be fake on Rogan like a day ago. 😂🤦🏽‍♂️

Ответить
@mattnicholls5084
@mattnicholls5084 - 16.04.2024 15:31

why don’t they just carbon date the paint. That would end all arguments

Ответить
@erniemajor
@erniemajor - 14.04.2024 02:18

What would the point be, for stone workers to write the name of a king ONLY on materials destined for an obscure 'chamber'? How does that prove 'Khufu' was the current ruler? Old British 'gangs' could just as well paint 'Britannia!' to 'prove'....something or other? The only reason this is a sacred taboo now is to keep mainstream happy

Ответить
@cal2127
@cal2127 - 12.04.2024 21:54

construction workers make marks all the time. tell you where to cut etc.

Ответить
@cal2127
@cal2127 - 12.04.2024 21:43

if its ochre, ochre is organic. you could carbon date it

Ответить
@777ViNsTeR777
@777ViNsTeR777 - 10.04.2024 22:43

i thought hieroglyphs were used for special occasions and that the common script was hieratic, wouldnt the grapheity be written in hieratic if it was workers?

Ответить
@standingbear998
@standingbear998 - 10.04.2024 20:59

un scientific science. so called science has become a joke. This isn't evidence in any way of who built it or when.

Ответить
@amyp6562
@amyp6562 - 09.04.2024 20:14

What a totally biased video, I thought you was going to be honest, but the first mentions of the author, you say words that clearly show you don't like his views, instead of sticking to the facts you attacked the author, if you didn't add those words "none other than Mr anunnaki" and "inconvenient evidence" "because the quary marks meant it was build by Khufu" that's the most crazy thing i've ever heard you say, marks on stone doesn't prove it was Khufu or aliens, both would have used tools. very disappointed in this video, I watch all of yours, but if you delete this comment I'll know I was right. Maybe do a full video about the german guys that flaked off the paint and got it tested! they were nearly arrested.

Ответить
@user-kw2kn1cv2h
@user-kw2kn1cv2h - 09.04.2024 16:44

I admit that you changed my mind about this working gangs original graffiti. To say it more appropriate you did educate me about the real scientific data and I THANK YOU for that! My personal opinion on the matter of ancient civilizations is that they were underestimated by the colonialist adventurers who laid the foundations of the archeology and ancient history and the whole concept should be revised by modern science. The truth the one greatest wonder of human kind cant be build only by the enlightened knowledge of one dynasty it simply is much older and longer used way of building in order to come to this masterpiece experience.

Ответить
@ellen4956
@ellen4956 - 09.04.2024 00:37

@AncientArchitects
Thank you for continuing to relentlessly pursue the truth, and present the evidence without bias. There are so many who state their ideas as facts and you never do that. You let us draw our own conclusions based on the facts. It's very much appreciated by me and by others who have a great interest in the ancient world.

Ответить
@praveenb9048
@praveenb9048 - 08.04.2024 13:54

I don't know enough to make serious comments like everyone else. But i couldn't help smiling the first couple of times i heard "relieving chamber".

Ответить
@edgarsnake2857
@edgarsnake2857 - 06.04.2024 12:46

Tough subject because the markings look so amateurish.

Ответить
@fenrirgg
@fenrirgg - 04.04.2024 06:50

Very interesting. Always the graffitis have important information in archeology 😅

Ответить
@TheAzachiel
@TheAzachiel - 03.04.2024 18:58

Brilliant video, thanks. After this one and one of yours previous videos, that one which shows newly discovered way how pyramid could be build, makes me lean away from alternative theories. However we should have carbon dating of the graffiti to be 100% sure. Please make video on what other evidence we have that Khufu really build the pyramid. Thanks.

Ответить
@demharsh
@demharsh - 03.04.2024 14:09

Great work! Thank you

Ответить