Комментарии:
China aircarrier was built in Ukraine
ОтветитьTotally missing from this video is the fact that American aircraft have a far higher sortie rate...and their engines and electronics have a much longer service life between major overhauls.
ОтветитьOnce the Fujian carrier group is fully operational, its advanced capabilities will have the US navy quaking in their boots!
ОтветитьIt doesn't matter if the turning radius is 500m or 3.4km, as an anti-ship missile travels at an average 1-5 Mach speed, including a 100-400 km/h torpedo speed.
ОтветитьI can see a torpedo with Fujian's name written all over it.
ОтветитьHow else will they learn?
ОтветитьAircrap Carrier ❌
Garbage Carrier ✔
The worst thing occur is when it's break failed.
ОтветитьThen the Fijian is doom from the start as with such a wide radius of turning it can't maintain a tight battle formation as every ship near it's need to scamper away to avoid being hit and it opened the carrier to torpedo attacks. If all of China new carriers are like this then China can kiss them goodbye.
ОтветитьThe chinese can copy the outside design of aircarft jet fighter but the problem of chinese is the engine of there machine could not match the outside design lacking of power to run the machine😂😂
ОтветитьLST Fujian - - - Large Slow Target Fujian
Ответить3.4km to turn? A submarine torpedo's wet dream.
ОтветитьThis is what happened when you hacked and stole only half of the blueprint, shipdesign and document.
ОтветитьFor now west taiwan has a brown water navy with few ships capable of getting far from home in case they break down or need to be refueled.
ОтветитьIf the Chinese can sail across all around the world...UK, US, GERMANY and JAPAN have been doint it since the 1930s...China has a LONG WAY to go to Master Carrier tatics..👉🏻
ОтветитьLet's down grade the opposition, we all known China is going to overtake us very quickly
ОтветитьMost likely doesn't have bow thrusters people forget that modern ships and have thrusters at the front to help them steer better
ОтветитьNot surprising at all. Its made in china
ОтветитьI heard how the chinese tanks worked in Nigeria. I ain't that worried...
ОтветитьTofu Dreg Aircraft Carrier
ОтветитьXi Jinping the failure.
ОтветитьMore weapon, more aircraft carrier, 3million soldiers(more expenses) , 12 trillions debt,1.5 billions populations, economic colapse,..more increasing problems 😅😅😅
Ответить👻🤣🤡🤡😁😂😹💩Piece of metal junk😜👏
ОтветитьNO DOUBT pla HAS SOME FINE WARRIORS WITH STRONG RESOLVE, SOME...... THE REST ARE MADE TO SUFFER AND DIE NEEDLESSLY, MOST WOULD RATHER JUST GO HOME. ccp DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THEM.....CANNON FODDER ! TERRIBLE !
Ответитьhonestly as of right this moment, china can't afford to go to war. not a great idea when india might join in on one side and everyone else on the other
ОтветитьThose chinese ships can go visit the bismarck
ОтветитьThe fujian the name is what it lacks.fusion china shouldn't even be in this speech.
ОтветитьDiesel engine have many problems compared to nuclear power plant
ОтветитьIs the Ronald Reagan more agile than the Fujian? Yes, probably. Unless they know you're watching and are actually misleading you with their testing.
Is the Ronald Reagan capable of dodging missiles? How about... no? Carriers are slow. It may be relatively faster than Chinese carriers, but still slow af. It's not a carrier's job to dodge missiles anyway. They have the accompanying destroyers in the fleet to do that.
Chinese equipment is mainly reverse engineered Russian equipment & stolen American stealth technology
ОтветитьI just love it's smoky chimney. 🤩
ОтветитьJust to add, a Nimitz class carries desil for backup fuel and can even resupply other ships in the carrier group. It's a flagship in all ways and when directed energy weapons become a thing, their defensive abilities will skyrocket and may even alow them to do shore battery.
Personaly, dich the railgun and use coild guns. More complex but far more durable to usage based wear and tear.
Chinese: no need to dodge we have Super Power ultra Dynamic Invincible magnetic force field+++
ОтветитьThe Chinese admirals must realize that fighting the combined might of the three great naval powers of World War 2 (The United States, United Kingdom, and Japan) would mean a short trip to the bottom of the ocean.
ОтветитьEven a sailing ship of the same size would have a smaller radius
ОтветитьThat's why u can't copy American carrier but then don't copy the engine.
Without nuclear power u can't move such big ship.
Why do u think UK diesel carrier is much smaller.
Everything is fake in china. China is so consistent in making bad products and invading another country to claim it as its own.
ОтветитьThe issue is China can have told the captain what amount of turn they are allowed to do. Why? Satellites. Don't assume your enemy is an idiot.
ОтветитьChinese Communist are all imitation on anything they built on Military warfare "Made In China" like Toys for the Military Adult because China never went out on a real combat battle using latest technology all they use are Martial Arts using swords Bow and Arrows, darts
ОтветитьYou honestly think they don't know that satellites are watching, and COULD be showing it weaker than it is?
Chinese could be pulling one off over the rest of the world. Just saying there is that plausibility.
The CCP made are full of SHIT.
Everything made in China all copy and fake.
👎👎👎
👉🇨🇳🦮
🔥🔥🔥
😂😂 worldwide made in China is considered the worst of the worst. No one has ever gotten anything that said made in China and thought oh this is going to work great forever
ОтветитьLet's be honest about what the Fujian mostly is under the hood. The engines, drive train and steering gear were probably lifted wholesale from large commercial ships. Big container ships or tankers. These are the only experience Chinese Shipyards and Naval designers have with large ship design. It's also the only way they could get it built and afloat so quickly. But it turns like a large heavy container ship.
ОтветитьFull of fake and make haters exciting.
ОтветитьThat’s why Chinese Coast Guards are ramming into Phillipines boats, they have shitty turn radius! 😂
ОтветитьChina was never a ship building civilization. They was always recruiting sailor and ship builders from the south aka Vietnam, Philippine etc. throughout their feudal and medieval period.
ОтветитьHow does the ccp always fool themselves into thinking they've done something impressive when in reality it's just embarrassing and sad?😂
Ответить