China’s Fujian Aircraft Carrier’s Three Myths Shattered, 3.4km Turning Radius—7X Reagan’s

China’s Fujian Aircraft Carrier’s Three Myths Shattered, 3.4km Turning Radius—7X Reagan’s

China Observer

5 месяцев назад

100,552 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Peter-o
@Peter-o - 29.06.2024 10:22

China aircarrier was built in Ukraine

Ответить
@charlesharper2357
@charlesharper2357 - 29.06.2024 11:23

Totally missing from this video is the fact that American aircraft have a far higher sortie rate...and their engines and electronics have a much longer service life between major overhauls.

Ответить
@howardtreesong4860
@howardtreesong4860 - 29.06.2024 15:02

Once the Fujian carrier group is fully operational, its advanced capabilities will have the US navy quaking in their boots!

Ответить
@tomasgogashvily5350
@tomasgogashvily5350 - 29.06.2024 21:37

It doesn't matter if the turning radius is 500m or 3.4km, as an anti-ship missile travels at an average 1-5 Mach speed, including a 100-400 km/h torpedo speed.

Ответить
@WetPets-gl2ts
@WetPets-gl2ts - 29.06.2024 22:19

I can see a torpedo with Fujian's name written all over it.

Ответить
@user-gz2hn8sy6k
@user-gz2hn8sy6k - 30.06.2024 15:23

How else will they learn?

Ответить
@madlaxshadow1729
@madlaxshadow1729 - 30.06.2024 19:25

Aircrap Carrier ❌
Garbage Carrier ✔

Ответить
@RolandoVillanueva-eo1zc
@RolandoVillanueva-eo1zc - 01.07.2024 03:42

The worst thing occur is when it's break failed.

Ответить
@Saint-nowie
@Saint-nowie - 01.07.2024 05:25

Then the Fijian is doom from the start as with such a wide radius of turning it can't maintain a tight battle formation as every ship near it's need to scamper away to avoid being hit and it opened the carrier to torpedo attacks. If all of China new carriers are like this then China can kiss them goodbye.

Ответить
@user-egb344edy
@user-egb344edy - 01.07.2024 20:45

The chinese can copy the outside design of aircarft jet fighter but the problem of chinese is the engine of there machine could not match the outside design lacking of power to run the machine😂😂

Ответить
@jerryharlowe9209
@jerryharlowe9209 - 02.07.2024 00:29

LST Fujian - - - Large Slow Target Fujian

Ответить
@fmeraz37
@fmeraz37 - 02.07.2024 05:45

3.4km to turn? A submarine torpedo's wet dream.

Ответить
@klsar1
@klsar1 - 02.07.2024 06:10

This is what happened when you hacked and stole only half of the blueprint, shipdesign and document.

Ответить
@RobertMarshall-d2n
@RobertMarshall-d2n - 02.07.2024 13:02

For now west taiwan has a brown water navy with few ships capable of getting far from home in case they break down or need to be refueled.

Ответить
@willwozniak2826
@willwozniak2826 - 02.07.2024 17:49

If the Chinese can sail across all around the world...UK, US, GERMANY and JAPAN have been doint it since the 1930s...China has a LONG WAY to go to Master Carrier tatics..👉🏻

Ответить
@alunrees5130
@alunrees5130 - 03.07.2024 09:21

Let's down grade the opposition, we all known China is going to overtake us very quickly

Ответить
@nkill6
@nkill6 - 03.07.2024 21:54

Most likely doesn't have bow thrusters people forget that modern ships and have thrusters at the front to help them steer better

Ответить
@renzverg119
@renzverg119 - 04.07.2024 15:37

Not surprising at all. Its made in china

Ответить
@iamaloafofbread8926
@iamaloafofbread8926 - 05.07.2024 12:24

I heard how the chinese tanks worked in Nigeria. I ain't that worried...

Ответить
@YukitoOnline
@YukitoOnline - 06.07.2024 09:41

Tofu Dreg Aircraft Carrier

Ответить
@aron_e39b77
@aron_e39b77 - 06.07.2024 13:52

Xi Jinping the failure.

Ответить
@emanecleo5212
@emanecleo5212 - 06.07.2024 15:01

More weapon, more aircraft carrier, 3million soldiers(more expenses) , 12 trillions debt,1.5 billions populations, economic colapse,..more increasing problems 😅😅😅

Ответить
@roncasa4042
@roncasa4042 - 07.07.2024 05:03

👻🤣🤡🤡😁😂😹💩Piece of metal junk😜👏

Ответить
@straightshooter3693
@straightshooter3693 - 07.07.2024 18:59

NO DOUBT pla HAS SOME FINE WARRIORS WITH STRONG RESOLVE, SOME...... THE REST ARE MADE TO SUFFER AND DIE NEEDLESSLY, MOST WOULD RATHER JUST GO HOME. ccp DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THEM.....CANNON FODDER ! TERRIBLE !

Ответить
@navytiger2
@navytiger2 - 09.07.2024 01:24

honestly as of right this moment, china can't afford to go to war. not a great idea when india might join in on one side and everyone else on the other

Ответить
@thomasferrari6465
@thomasferrari6465 - 10.07.2024 17:45

Those chinese ships can go visit the bismarck

Ответить
@StratificationSmith
@StratificationSmith - 12.07.2024 13:31

The fujian the name is what it lacks.fusion china shouldn't even be in this speech.

Ответить
@byssmal
@byssmal - 21.07.2024 16:38

Diesel engine have many problems compared to nuclear power plant

Ответить
@LeongGunners
@LeongGunners - 22.07.2024 05:09

Is the Ronald Reagan more agile than the Fujian? Yes, probably. Unless they know you're watching and are actually misleading you with their testing.
Is the Ronald Reagan capable of dodging missiles? How about... no? Carriers are slow. It may be relatively faster than Chinese carriers, but still slow af. It's not a carrier's job to dodge missiles anyway. They have the accompanying destroyers in the fleet to do that.

Ответить
@BabaSal-s3y
@BabaSal-s3y - 23.07.2024 22:21

Chinese equipment is mainly reverse engineered Russian equipment & stolen American stealth technology

Ответить
@Augusto-s2u
@Augusto-s2u - 02.08.2024 05:22

I just love it's smoky chimney. 🤩

Ответить
@gdragonlord749
@gdragonlord749 - 05.08.2024 16:00

Just to add, a Nimitz class carries desil for backup fuel and can even resupply other ships in the carrier group. It's a flagship in all ways and when directed energy weapons become a thing, their defensive abilities will skyrocket and may even alow them to do shore battery.

Personaly, dich the railgun and use coild guns. More complex but far more durable to usage based wear and tear.

Ответить
@dadehloki
@dadehloki - 06.08.2024 03:42

Chinese: no need to dodge we have Super Power ultra Dynamic Invincible magnetic force field+++

Ответить
@johnrussell1881
@johnrussell1881 - 25.08.2024 21:42

The Chinese admirals must realize that fighting the combined might of the three great naval powers of World War 2 (The United States, United Kingdom, and Japan) would mean a short trip to the bottom of the ocean.

Ответить
@LuKaZz420
@LuKaZz420 - 05.09.2024 00:14

Even a sailing ship of the same size would have a smaller radius

Ответить
@bt9087
@bt9087 - 06.09.2024 09:26

That's why u can't copy American carrier but then don't copy the engine.

Without nuclear power u can't move such big ship.

Why do u think UK diesel carrier is much smaller.

Ответить
@renzverg119
@renzverg119 - 05.10.2024 12:09

Everything is fake in china. China is so consistent in making bad products and invading another country to claim it as its own.

Ответить
@garhent
@garhent - 10.10.2024 14:19

The issue is China can have told the captain what amount of turn they are allowed to do. Why? Satellites. Don't assume your enemy is an idiot.

Ответить
@czar89031
@czar89031 - 10.10.2024 20:12

Chinese Communist are all imitation on anything they built on Military warfare "Made In China" like Toys for the Military Adult because China never went out on a real combat battle using latest technology all they use are Martial Arts using swords Bow and Arrows, darts

Ответить
@AmJaxineer
@AmJaxineer - 11.10.2024 15:38

You honestly think they don't know that satellites are watching, and COULD be showing it weaker than it is?

Chinese could be pulling one off over the rest of the world. Just saying there is that plausibility.

Ответить
@DJT-s3k
@DJT-s3k - 13.10.2024 16:09

The CCP made are full of SHIT.
Everything made in China all copy and fake.
👎👎👎
👉🇨🇳🦮
🔥🔥🔥

Ответить
@walterbryan2637
@walterbryan2637 - 16.10.2024 04:54

😂😂 worldwide made in China is considered the worst of the worst. No one has ever gotten anything that said made in China and thought oh this is going to work great forever

Ответить
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 - 18.10.2024 08:13

Let's be honest about what the Fujian mostly is under the hood. The engines, drive train and steering gear were probably lifted wholesale from large commercial ships. Big container ships or tankers. These are the only experience Chinese Shipyards and Naval designers have with large ship design. It's also the only way they could get it built and afloat so quickly. But it turns like a large heavy container ship.

Ответить
@davidz7858
@davidz7858 - 22.10.2024 16:40

Full of fake and make haters exciting.

Ответить
@TommyAventador
@TommyAventador - 23.10.2024 10:56

That’s why Chinese Coast Guards are ramming into Phillipines boats, they have shitty turn radius! 😂

Ответить
@ryannguyen7466
@ryannguyen7466 - 29.10.2024 16:51

China was never a ship building civilization. They was always recruiting sailor and ship builders from the south aka Vietnam, Philippine etc. throughout their feudal and medieval period.

Ответить
@ramseydoon8277
@ramseydoon8277 - 28.11.2024 08:41

How does the ccp always fool themselves into thinking they've done something impressive when in reality it's just embarrassing and sad?😂

Ответить