Stop, Mr. Mehta, Control Yourself; CJI Warns Mehta, waqf hearing #lawchakra #supremecourtofindia

Stop, Mr. Mehta, Control Yourself; CJI Warns Mehta, waqf hearing #lawchakra #supremecourtofindia

Law Chakra

55 лет назад

93,401 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@arifautomobile
@arifautomobile - 04.06.2025 15:42

kindly name the state that has completed the survey of waqf properties.

Ответить
@9930940553
@9930940553 - 31.05.2025 19:10

CJI's remarks are meant for Kapil Sibal and not for Tushar Mehta. Please correct the caption.

Ответить
@alluallu7248
@alluallu7248 - 31.05.2025 15:05

SC should be asking , why wakf is exclusively permitted for muslims in a secular democracy of India. Why it was accorded so many overreaching powers , while other religions are deprived of similar powers. All other discussions are futile and wasting of time. SC needs to wake up before Indian public say enough is enough.

Ответить
@krishnamohandravida4791
@krishnamohandravida4791 - 31.05.2025 14:46

In this case Supreme Court and Cji is the right person to decide with wast Knowledge and experienced Lawyers argued

Ответить
@jampatashi5429
@jampatashi5429 - 30.05.2025 18:24

That is power of Judiciary in largest Democratic Nation like India🙏🙏

Ответить
@shyamsundarojha6048
@shyamsundarojha6048 - 29.05.2025 20:53

INDIAN CONSTITUTION SHOULD RULE

Ответить
@Padmanaban-x2t
@Padmanaban-x2t - 29.05.2025 18:34

Mr. Kapil Sibel made a constructive arguement as per the constitutional norms.

Ответить
@Padmanaban-x2t
@Padmanaban-x2t - 29.05.2025 18:32

CJI acted acording to the constitutional norms. Hats off to CJI.

Ответить
@yourdad-eg9zb
@yourdad-eg9zb - 29.05.2025 15:14

Bjp is targetting minorities

Ответить
@mintusaren895
@mintusaren895 - 29.05.2025 08:47

Adibasi kaise bante hai.

Ответить
@thangap200
@thangap200 - 29.05.2025 06:42

Thushar mehta is always jumping and trying mislead the justice

Ответить
@AmanGusain-o6n
@AmanGusain-o6n - 29.05.2025 05:59

so waqf can declare any property as their own which cannot be contested or interfered by state government but somehow responsibility of registering the land comes under state government and other then that while registering state government cant even ask the waqf property the legistamacy of that property wohh is it a democratic country or just some gundaraj.

Ответить
@Fearless......
@Fearless...... - 28.05.2025 19:42

Kapil Sibal sir Is a force of nature. May god protect him and guide him.

Ответить
@jimmyjimmy553
@jimmyjimmy553 - 28.05.2025 17:23

This is all natak... Our law system is totally corrupt and fixed. Forget the other pending cases, there are more than 5 lakh cases pending for rape and child molestation since years... And we call them my lord.... Had 500 rs burnt notes would have been found in my house like it did in justice vermas house, by now I wid be in jail and all was done in justice vermas case was that he was transferred to Prayag Raj high court.... People die awaiting justice and we call them my lord. Try getting involved in the legal system of India once, right from Police to courts and you will be sucked out of ur lives.

Ответить
@Realknowledge9
@Realknowledge9 - 28.05.2025 16:59

Justice is there, Constitution is great, CJI is the right person with knowledge
Jai hind 🇮🇳

Ответить
@user-smrkk
@user-smrkk - 28.05.2025 12:14

How can SC provide justice to poor people, dalit, adivasi and govt whose land captured without documents by wakf board?

Ответить
@PritK12
@PritK12 - 27.05.2025 21:06

WAQF board wants to make SECULAR India as Islamic country gradually.

Ответить
@PritK12
@PritK12 - 27.05.2025 21:05

If India has already allocated Pakistan and Bangladesh countries for Muslims population then Why Indian Muslims want WAQF board in India to impose Islamic laws ?
Its misuse of Secularism against Sanatani Hinduism and other religions of India.
Illegal activities of WAQF should b stopped by Indian Government. Without any legal documents, so many WAQF Board Muslims r getting all kind of benefits.

Ответить
@Jill-qg5nd
@Jill-qg5nd - 27.05.2025 20:53

The Supreme Court of India is the "protector" or "guardian" of the Constitution. Its role is to interpret and uphold the Constitution, ensuring that all laws and government actions comply with constitutional principles. Through the power of judicial review, the Supreme Court can invalidate any parliamentary law or executive action that violates the Constitution, especially the fundamental rights of citizens.

Ответить
@RKV8527
@RKV8527 - 27.05.2025 18:37

Rich advocates like Kapil Sibel etc get dates, hearing, bail, and final judgment directly from SC at lightning speed. WHAT IS THE SECRET??? Millions who feel injustice has been done have been waiting indefinitely for decades, senior citizens, poor-class middle-class pensioners have been pushed to the wall. Many senior citizens died still case was not heard at all. Indian judges are unquestionable due to the threat of contempt of court, arrest, and jail in a democracy, and freedom of speech.

Ответить
@RKV8527
@RKV8527 - 27.05.2025 18:36

HC allows CELEBI to operate in the airport. HC allows to creation of law, without the consent of the President of India. Look at the court system. It is stinking. Rich advocates get dates, hearing, bail, and final judgment directly from SC at lightning speed. WHAT IS THE SECRET??? Millions who feel injustice has been done have been waiting indefinitely for decades, senior citizens, poor-class middle-class pensioners have been pushed to the wall. Many senior citizens died still case was not heard at all. Indian judges are unquestionable due to the threat of contempt of court, arrest, and jail in a democracy, and freedom of speech.
Judges are not performing their duties like doctors, engineers, bank staff, or govt /private company staff, which has caused the pendency of millions of cases. Can other professionals accumulate their assignments indefinitely? Employer applies " No work, No Pay" law of the court.
After the SC judgement against the President of India, the TN ruling party leaders claim they will pass a bill for state autonomy and implement it even if the President does not approve it. SC claims that it will take cognisance if hate speech is made, but not when hate murders occur. Udhaya Stalin and A Raja made hate speeches. But SC sat quietly. Hindu women are killed in West Bengal, but the SC has not taken cognisance. The logical reason is that hate speech is harsher than hate killings.
(1) Judges want to perform the executive function of appointment judges, the CBI chief, CEC
(2) judges want to perform the function of Lok Sabha, drafting laws for protection from state action against illegal grabbing of public land, illegal construction, even posing a safety threat without fire safety/ structural engineering
Delhi HC judge is the face, and the NO ACTION against him speaks volumes about the SECRET THINGS HAPPENING
Indian democracy has been going strong without a judicial system for millions of citizens.

Ответить
@sachinthirbany6333
@sachinthirbany6333 - 27.05.2025 17:48

This page and the courts are THE SIBAL SHOW. The name of this channel should be renamed.
Listen Mr Sibal, there are a million more serious issues. YOU seem to INSTRUCT Milords. IS THIS DEMOCRACY??

Ответить
@maharajaharichandra
@maharajaharichandra - 27.05.2025 12:49

IT is LOW 🤣🤣🤣Chakkar

Ответить
@PradeepM.p-e4e
@PradeepM.p-e4e - 27.05.2025 09:52

Hi hi we need military court, mr CJI we have strong military so control yourself .

Ответить
@subirbanerjee1487
@subirbanerjee1487 - 27.05.2025 08:42

When will addressing the court saying “My Lord” be done away with? It’s very disturbing.

Ответить
@RAKSHAK_21
@RAKSHAK_21 - 27.05.2025 07:53

Sibbal ki aisi ki tesi

Ответить
@JanakSaikia-rl8wv
@JanakSaikia-rl8wv - 27.05.2025 07:13

In a democratic country citizens of the country is the Supreme Authority, as like the Monarch or the King is the Supreme in a monarchy or Kingdom. Citizens elect its representatives who are making laws in the parliament. Judges are appointed by the Authorities. Can the judiciary punish the monarch or the King in a monarchy or a kingdom. If the judiciary has the power to dissolve the Parliament, i.e. the Loksbha of India , then Judiciary can cancelled a law passed by both the or imposed stay order on a law dully passed by noth the parliament of India. There are three pillars in a democracy. One is the legislature,who makes laws, one is the executive,who implement the laws, and another one is the judiciary who are watching whether the laws are implemented equally. As such every three have its own jurisdiction of functions. If the the Supreme Court has the power to dissolve the Loksabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, then it can definitely cancelled or impasse stay order on a bill passed by the Parliament in a parliamentary Democracy. The MPs represent the citizens of the country. Judges are appointed by the President of India. Citizens are the above all in a democracy.

Ответить
@alloysis1
@alloysis1 - 27.05.2025 06:26

Tushar Mehta is like the Mandir ka ghanta.

Ответить
@star67641
@star67641 - 27.05.2025 06:12

Mehta will control does this Chief Justice know in Tamil Nadu a Dalit Chairwoman of a Panchayat could not take Oath to assume office, will he visit the place and make the Chairwoman take Oath..!

Ответить
@vasudevholla1214
@vasudevholla1214 - 27.05.2025 04:56

Paisa bolta hai

Ответить
@nufkistruff9961
@nufkistruff9961 - 26.05.2025 22:53

Sibal is a curse to this country.

Ответить
@SandeepKumar-nn6pr
@SandeepKumar-nn6pr - 26.05.2025 22:29

🔴There is no Hadus/Hadith to show that WAQF IS PERPETUAL
🔴There is no Hadis which defines WAQF BY USER as being misled by Kapil Sibal
🔴There is no Hadis which defines WAQF.

Ответить
@maverikk-Myc
@maverikk-Myc - 26.05.2025 22:00

Kapil sibal is a master

Ответить
@mrityunjaykumar5747
@mrityunjaykumar5747 - 26.05.2025 21:55

This Sibbal pay from his pocket

Ответить
@vinayakdegwekar7628
@vinayakdegwekar7628 - 26.05.2025 19:57

It's high time to control the drama in the SC. It seems the judgement against the Amendment to Waqf Act is ready and these hearings are only whitewash.

Ответить
@sankarsri2041
@sankarsri2041 - 26.05.2025 19:44

KABIL SIBIL IS DEVIL’s ADVOCATE LIKE SHYLOK WILL TALK ANY FOR MONEY

Ответить
@dharmarajan7030
@dharmarajan7030 - 26.05.2025 19:31

Authentic verdicts analyse the pros and cons in detail.Hasty verdicts betray non application of minds to the issues due to culpability.God save innocent Indians!

Ответить
@gbhatia9809
@gbhatia9809 - 26.05.2025 19:19

Issues on Waqf are clear:
"The Waqf is not a Qur’anic injunction". It is not donation to Allah but to Islam & is component of Sharia. Waqf properties have been demolished or changed to other use in Muslim countries. If Waqf graveyard is near the border & the military for security reasons of its ideal secure location wants to convert it as bunker or a mortar gun site, it can't convert because "Once a Waqf, always a Waqf" is ridiculous argument.
Waqf entities are on the sovereign land of the country. Therefore, their location & size must have approved registered land records.
The purposes of each Waqf entity should be clearly defined: To ensure it fulfils its objective of serving the poor & the needy. If it is mosque, only approved Sermons can be given as in Saudi Arabia & Europe. If is madrasa only approved education. It must help needy people in education, marriage, divorce, death, burial & help youth in gainful employment. To achieve this, accounts of Waqf entities must be audited every year & regular inspection conducted to ensure that the Waqf entity is indeed fulfilling its designated purpose.
Who must ensure this compliance? Not the people who have conflict of interest but govt nominees from audit, law enforcement depts & prominent neutral citizens,
Who can deliver services like sermons, education & other help? Only people selected by the Waqf, but accounts must be audited that there is no embezzlement of funds, disbursals to favorites or to persons not entitled as per the law.
Waqf is both a management & service entity. Both must be under govt's oversight. India's Unified-Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995 (UMEED Act) reflects broader reform objectives.
Mohammad Tauahidi governing member of the Global Imam Council (GIC), UAE said Waqf institutions are under govt supervision & control in UAE. Waqf institutions should follow the laws emphasizing such institutions need to play a wide role in serving society & ensuring transparent management.

Ответить
@venkateshparthasarathy1976
@venkateshparthasarathy1976 - 26.05.2025 19:16

One person presents, against a law that Indian Parliament has passed!!
What is this?

Ответить
@shailendrabehera8512
@shailendrabehera8512 - 26.05.2025 19:14

Mr Kutil, why didn't the waqf board report waqf and apply for registration. Btw, upto 2013, it was his Congi party and congi state govts all over. It was he and his gang members who didn't do their duty, if any.

Ответить
@kpb9010
@kpb9010 - 26.05.2025 19:10

Waqf registration was not done because politicians and their lackeys were misusing the properties. Mr Sibbal is the proposer and the accused 😅😅😅😅😅

Ответить
@rajk-qk7ne
@rajk-qk7ne - 26.05.2025 18:47

What is the foundation for introducing a waqf board after independence....a tenet of a religion whose guardianship is technically with pakistan as of by way of 1947 partition....how can there be limitless tenets in a religion....how can a tenet unheard of in a spiritual sense be considered as a tenet of a religion here....

Ответить
@mrunknowngamer1006
@mrunknowngamer1006 - 26.05.2025 18:27

Ye bjp wale itne ro kyun rahe hai 😂😂?

Ответить
@mvramaraoknr3124
@mvramaraoknr3124 - 26.05.2025 18:19

Sibal 😂😂😂

Ответить
@behappyandsafeandsecure
@behappyandsafeandsecure - 26.05.2025 17:50

Kapil will against indian govt,,,all cases,,, money more from Vakkaf

Ответить
@gangadharam9736
@gangadharam9736 - 26.05.2025 17:46

Parlamentary sovereignty
Under this doctrine parlament is the supreme law -making authority and can make unmake or amend any law this means that no other body including the judiciary, can overrule or invalidate an act of parlament .

Ответить
@gangadharam9736
@gangadharam9736 - 26.05.2025 17:40

Article -122
Legislative independence
This article safeguards the legislative independence of parliament by preventing the courts from interfereing in its internal affairs and proceedings.

Ответить
@LostSoul-dd5wq
@LostSoul-dd5wq - 26.05.2025 17:35

Law chakra chulsim giri started.

Ответить
@ImranShaikh-hs4iy
@ImranShaikh-hs4iy - 26.05.2025 17:13

We Indian's are so lucky. Hum ko kapil sibble ji Prashant Bhushan, Manu Singhvi jaise sacular advocate mile hai 🎉

Ответить
@Yugpurush2020
@Yugpurush2020 - 26.05.2025 16:46

कपिल सिब्बल सही है , मोदी के तुषार मेहता फालतू है

Ответить