4 MAJOR LINUX FILE SYSTEM:  EXT4 , XFS, ZFS, BTRFS

4 MAJOR LINUX FILE SYSTEM: EXT4 , XFS, ZFS, BTRFS

XPSTECH

3 года назад

33,953 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

moonanite
moonanite - 29.08.2023 04:23

Fantastic explanation. Thank you!

Ответить
sumit srivastava
sumit srivastava - 01.04.2023 23:00

good video , I've been searching for clear explanation about ex3,xfs and btrfs. thanks!

Ответить
Richard BENNETT
Richard BENNETT - 23.11.2022 21:18

True that ZFS is proprietary, but OpenZFS is open source and not proprietary.

Ответить
Richard BENNETT
Richard BENNETT - 23.11.2022 21:17

ZFS and btrfs have been and are still called copy on write systems, but they actually are more accurately redirect on write systems. It's similar to the confusion over gibibytes and gigabytes. They are not the same thing, but people use copy on write for both anyway. Bad practice.

Ответить
ARI-ATH Badminton
ARI-ATH Badminton - 17.10.2022 22:22

So well explained thanks you Sir!

Ответить
Enkii Muto
Enkii Muto - 13.08.2022 06:21

* googles a video on what copy-on-write is *

* Watches the whole video until we get to btrfs *

"copy on write makes it better overall"

alrighty then

Ответить
yksnidog
yksnidog - 27.07.2022 00:20

Which one would you recommend for a) private usage b) big amounts of small files <1MB and which for c) mostly files around 0.5 to 1.6 GB and which if b & c or a, b and c come together?

Ответить
sup2069
sup2069 - 30.04.2022 07:26

Nice job! Simple clear video!

Ответить
Lance Lovett
Lance Lovett - 29.03.2022 12:51

Thank you so much for this video! This is the first time I have seen anyone answer my curiosity about what the difference in each filesystem was and why one would be more desirable than another.
Please keep doing the esoteric topics that many would be interested in but don't know where to get the info.
I am trying to kick my Microsoft habit completely. Unfortunately, I have been a junkie since Dos 2.

Ответить
Dragonek GNU / Linux PL
Dragonek GNU / Linux PL - 28.03.2022 16:02

btrfs with subvolumes are the best choice i think. Now it's working rly good

Ответить
Sharafat Karim
Sharafat Karim - 14.03.2022 17:31

cool! thanks

Ответить
Leon Alien
Leon Alien - 05.03.2022 00:13

started the vid and can u pls talk a bit quieter, so i can hear the bugs fucking outside

Ответить
logicawe
logicawe - 25.02.2022 18:13

ok ok, what we doing here. I kinda like this.

Ответить
lucius1976
lucius1976 - 25.02.2022 12:09

What kind of keep me from using anything else then ext4 is that all other have less support. btrfs seems to be equally supported but zfs is not even supported in the Kernel by Standard. I think you have to load it into the Kernel with some non GPL licence. Not really what i want to do

Ответить
Seba C.
Seba C. - 23.02.2022 03:55

I've been searching for clear explanation about current file systems for a couple of hours... and too be honest your video nailed it completely, thanks for sharing and enlighten our minds with your knowledge buddy!

Ответить
Haythem Ferjani
Haythem Ferjani - 11.02.2022 17:03

A very good explanation. Thank you for that

Ответить
Richard
Richard - 12.01.2022 06:02

just excellent

Ответить
Bala Murugan
Bala Murugan - 19.12.2021 20:28

Very nice sir

Ответить
MITHUB OPENSOURCE LAB
MITHUB OPENSOURCE LAB - 16.12.2021 17:04

Great Video, though the many important features of ZFS are not covered [ e.g. transparent compression ]. Secondly, ZFS for Linux is an open source project. Thirdly, BTRFS is not a matured file system by any standard. BTRFS Raid functionality is incomplete [ Especially Raid 5 and Raid 6 ] . You have not also not covered XFS file system comparison with EXT4.
Based on the available file system, its features, performance, scalability, there is no doubt that ZFS stands on # 1 spot.

Ответить
Unknown User
Unknown User - 11.12.2021 08:50

Do u recommend MAC or Windows for a beginner to purchase a laptop

Ответить
Alex Consdef
Alex Consdef - 04.12.2021 02:52

Man thank you so much for this video, i always wanted a deeper analysis on Linux filesystems!

Ответить
mehdi Mj
mehdi Mj - 26.11.2021 15:24

This is wonderful, thanks for detailed explanations.

Ответить
Hicknopunk
Hicknopunk - 11.11.2021 19:09

Autistic commenter here, I have a 6502 with a Quickdisk drive. I don't think it uses a file system, the drive cannot randomly access data either. There are probably other media out there without a file system like maybe C64 tapes.

Ответить
lamcho00
lamcho00 - 31.10.2021 04:14

Great video! I really like how you explained what a file system is and the major features and limitations.
I just need to add XFS also supports Copy-on-Write. I think this is important consideration when picking a file system.
Also currently BtrFS has some drawbacks compared to ZFS, namely BtrFS doesn't fully support Encryption, RAID 5/6, adaptive endanness or caching mechanisms like L2ARC or SLOG.
Which are not really big problems though. I like to think of it like this, if it's for home use pick BtfFS, if it's for work or sensitive data pick ZFS.

Ответить
Ali Valizada
Ali Valizada - 23.10.2021 17:02

Short but detailed description, thank you for your effort!

Ответить
_Memory1sRam_
_Memory1sRam_ - 23.09.2021 14:40

Startet with XFS over 10 years ago; used EXT4 a while later; nearly started using btrfs in the beginning of 2017 but using ZFS since than and I'm very happy with it! Looking forward to bcachefs in the next few years. Nice video!

Ответить
Lowbarr Kate
Lowbarr Kate - 17.09.2021 18:55

Happy to use btrfs for years, saved my life more than once.

Ответить
Damian Mee
Damian Mee - 04.09.2021 02:44

From my unfortunate experience, indian accent is a good predictor of low quality content on YT, so I can't even express how happy I was to watch this amazing, extremely informative, concise yet comprehensive summary–thank you so much 🙇🏻‍♂️ !

Ответить
OpenGL4ever
OpenGL4ever - 29.08.2021 09:17

Very good in depth video. Thank you!
But there is one thing to correct. btrfs is only better on paper, in reality its raid support is still experimental and it has problems using disk space even when it is telling the user, that enough disk space is left. It's not uncommon that it tells you after a copy operation, that it doesn't have enough disk space, even when it is claiming the opposite at first place.
The best FS at the moment of these 4 is ZFS. But because of its license, it can't be incorporated into the Linux kernel. Thus it's only working in user space in Linux.
As a consequence you usually can only choose between ext4 and XFS on Linux, while btrfs is too unreliable. Because of that, Red Hat discarded btrfs on their distribution and switched to XFS.

Ответить
Gábor Rotics
Gábor Rotics - 24.08.2021 14:19

Your channel is soo underrated, great videos with clear explanations, thank you!

Ответить
Neki Lik
Neki Lik - 21.08.2021 09:37

Good video 👍

Ответить
GNU /🐧 🚀🌛 ₿
GNU /🐧 🚀🌛 ₿ - 11.08.2021 07:18

Great video. :)
The best fs comes at the end.

My top 9000 filesystems (lower number, btr;) :
1 BTRFS
2 ZFS
3 XFS
3.5 forgot the name, there is a solid sdcard fs, or use BTRFS
4 EXT4

… there are many others which are solid in high ranks, but my name memory sucks hard and you should just use fat32 for UEFI /boot/efi and BTRFS for all the rest including /boot and don’t forget encrypting boot as well with LUKS, LUKS is great btw I use Arch.

Then comes:

8998 APFS
8999 HFS
9000 NTFS
9001 exFAT
9002 FAT32
9003 VFAT
9004 FAT16
… I’m not old enough for more


NTFS just sucks in my view, but it’s technically better than the things I listed below it.
fat32 is ok to use it only for /boot/efi


On non EFI you can use a ext4, xfs, fat32 for /boot, idk if BTRFS works there. Fat is guaranteed to work for a big fat boot party, in case it doesn’t work on old hardware with e.g. xfs. 🚣 🎉


XFS can’t be shrieked but extended.
That besides, when no BTRFS features are needed, it’s a great FS, but using BTRFS can’t hurt I guess, it’s the future in my view.

Greetings. :) 🖖

Ответить
PLASMA LIFE
PLASMA LIFE - 04.07.2021 17:17

❤️

Ответить
Matthew Barron
Matthew Barron - 21.06.2021 22:53

This is a fantastic video! I love how clearly you explain these linux filesystems. Thank you!

Ответить
NRDLTS
NRDLTS - 16.06.2021 11:18

Nice video
But volume is too low
Even in your other previous videos

Ответить
Binayak Kundu
Binayak Kundu - 15.06.2021 20:25

Very nicely explained.👍

Ответить
Maya krish
Maya krish - 15.06.2021 06:18

Which presentation software using?

Ответить
Viney
Viney - 13.06.2021 16:25

Thanks ❤️

Ответить
Vishal Arya
Vishal Arya - 13.06.2021 11:37

Audio ia too low..

Ответить
SpaceTimeBeing
SpaceTimeBeing - 13.06.2021 08:17

Your audio is too low...

Ответить
Tomoghno Sen
Tomoghno Sen - 13.06.2021 05:49

BTRFS user here

Ответить
Caio Valente
Caio Valente - 12.06.2021 18:43

nice video, bro! thanks!

Ответить
Twin Shadow
Twin Shadow - 12.06.2021 14:59

I think it's worth noting that XFS has the fastest start-up time and it ages much better then BTRFS.
All of the advanced features others offer aren't really worth the hassle for home users...

Ответить
Night Fury
Night Fury - 12.06.2021 12:22

good video, will study more about the mentioned file systems

Ответить