How to Argue - Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy #2

All nice and dandy until you have to argue with your wife.

If Aristotle indeed said that man is a rational animal, he would have used the word ἄνθρωπος, which refers to both men and women if I understand correctly. Not to deny sexism in his works however.

Can't the Barber just shave everyone then quit? Then the next person in line to be the Barber shaves him.

Now I want some bacon...

My appetitive soul would just like to say... BACON! bacon, bacon, bacon. Give me the bacon! Now excuse me while I go cook all the bacon in the fridge.

I have a question/comment about the thing with the barber. I do understand that he must be a part of the group of guys who shave themselves or guys who dont, but neither of those exclude himfrom being the barber, and since the barber cannot shave people who shave themselves, he cannot shave himself, because then the barber would be shaving someone who shaves themselves. However, if he were to not shave himself, then the barber would have failed to comply to the law that he must shave every man who does not shave themselves. So he can't shave himself, but he also can't not shave himself, so he must become exempt to these 2 laws, so he is not part of the group.

No 🙈 💨🍴

Its hard to make healthy decisions when you havent experienced the punishment yet.

The BEST 😮

my alevel teacher sent us this i love him so much he’s a legend

Why so serious¿ [The Joker] 2008.

so useful

This music reminds me of my first year college ❤

Not joking here I just learned bacon is bad for you

Philosophical reason was indeed reasonable.

I bet after this lesson, I am able to argue correctly and rationally.

Once again Great content! Thanks a lot!

Another good word for this is rhetoric

My argument is as follows: Aristotle is not sexist as he was a produce and child of his ERA, Society, Time, Norms, Knowledge, etc..
So implying that he was sexist because he said man is a rational animal is a fallacy. Actually the true argument here is that Man/Human/Person was never an animal but always a separate independant specie of creatures that evolved till we reached the Homosapiens and the rest is history.
Humans are living creatures, Animals are Living creatures, but Humans are not animals.

Let's say you are arguing from the perspective of a collective. Would it be logical to say that, if emotions influenced each other in a group, that morality is then an objective thing?

Vice versa, if you are arguing from the perspective of an individual. Would it be logical to say that, if your own emotions influenced only yourself, that morality is then subjective?

In conclusion, therefore, if the answer to both of these questions is yes, then morality is completely relative.

How did I do?

Can I just say how grateful I am to be in this time and age where this knowledge is right at my finger tips. Thank you so much for these videos i’m so grateful for you!

So the Baber can only shave himself one time and if the first time. If the 2nd states "barber must not shave any man who does shave himself", then the barber is not consider a man that shaves himself yet if hasn't shaved before. He us only consider a man that shaved before after the shaving. So therefore, he can only shave himself if its first and only time. After that he can't. lol idk I'm just theoretically speaking.

Tripartite soul split in 3

Rational logical - seek truth and swayed by facts and arguments

Spirited/ emotional - how feelings fuel your actions

Appetitive/ physical desires - drives you to eat have sex and protect yourself

An argument

Your beliefs should always be backed up by reasons which are called premises

Premises - support the structure

Premises form the structure of your argument.
They offer evidence for your belief, and you can have as many premises as you like, as long as they support your conclusion, which is the thing that you actually believe.

Deductive - if your premises are true then your conclusion must be true
Premise 1 all humans are mortal
Premise 2 Socrates is a human
Conclusion : Socrates is mortal
Entailment - one fact leads to another.

Begins with the general then reasons down to the specific. The truth of the premise must lead to the truth of the conclusion when this happens then the argument is valid no way the conclusion can be false when the premise are true .

Validity is not the same as the truth.
Validity= if the premises are true then your conclusion can't be false
If your premises don't guarantee the truth of your conclusion then you can end up in a stupid argument

Deductive soundness
Validity + all true premises

The temperature is sixty.
The temperature is rising.
Therfore,
Sixty is rising.

"entailment" in english is translated to spanish as "implicación"

this man fits the role of Mr Riddle

I would wish to hire a philosophy major in my team right now ( biz dev)

Aristotle was a sexist pig apparently

The barber must be shaved by his apprentice lol

Must people just want to be heard and when you ask questions that's a testimony that you were listening and is willing to learn because it's hard to understand experience and it's even harder to explain it so don't plz people don't say someone is dumb because you think you know more you just havent gone through what the individual has

Is it not indicative of philosophy that the barber situation is just hypothetical! It’s nonsense even !!!

Nothing starts with "N" and end with a "G". Check mate!

you dont know nothing about fhilosofhy, a fhilosofer is like neitzsche

Is to stand as philosophical stance with an almighty circumstance

Well , history shows that humans are not always “ rational “ , mostly aggressive apes , their actions are mostly selfish and destructive.

Religions are another sick area that people made up to make themselves look and sound better than others , and to prove it they often fight and kill each other !

I won lol

Where's #1?

Кто с Волгограда? подписываемся!

The Barber was a Woman. Problem solved.

Answer barber paradox: the barber is a woman

That all-cats argument was terrific 😂

hank sounds a lot like andy samberg

I need to say this...
He is officially a furry xd

Man just means human in this context

Best way to win an argument... Quote them and add 🤓

"John Green has a tail"

VALID ✔️✔️✔️

Hank is a furry confirmed

Wouldn't "man" just mean human, not male.