Комментарии:
Hey man, retired marine here. Stumbled across this channel last night. Absolutely loved both videos. I noticed however that you only have two videos posted over the last 6 months. I don’t know if it’s because you became disinterested or the fact that it takes a long time to produce these videos, but I do sincerely hope you keep pushing out content. This was fantastic.
ОтветитьHello. Like many other comments I am also US American citizen who is definitely not Chinese government employee. This is great video. veery accuracy. US navy should not mess with PLA.
ОтветитьHaving Atlas as a callsign would be cool . . .
Ответитьthis feels like a bunch of US propaganda
ОтветитьI find the lack of ships surrounding the carrier to be pretty unrealistic. Even if it was coming back from a lot intensity support mission, there would've been more ships in the strike group because they were traveling through a high tension zone. Carriers like the Ronald Reagan are our most valuable assets, and the Navy wouldn't let something that important go through such a tense zone with such little support. Plus, you seem to forget about any support coming from Taiwan or Japan. They almost certainly would've scrambled fighters in support as soon as fighting started. Even though they're pretty far away, they would've arrived near the end of the battle and totally could've helped turn things around and keep the strike group save. Because of that, the carrier strike group would've most likely been able to defend itself perfectly fine, and it definitely would not have been completely destroyed like that. If this did somehow happen IRL, then yeah it would've most likely ended like it does in the simulation. But the lack of support as shown in the simulation would most likely never happen.
ОтветитьThis is wildly unrealistic. AMRAAM is a good missile, but all evidence points to the PL-15 being it's equal, and neither is capable of high hit probabilities at their maximum ranges.
There's no overcoming physics; giving the US an almost 100% hit probability, especially when you predict them firing at the extreme end of their ranges against defensive targets is beyond the realm of believability.
Video game looks fun but do you really think a version released to the public holds all the cards in our arsenal? I bet our stealth bombers hit their ships before they can release new barrage
ОтветитьUS is always the aggressor
ОтветитьMade in Abyss?????????????????????????????????????????????
ОтветитьHey I'm sorry I'm a little late to the video but let me understand so did the US lose this scrimmage?
ОтветитьThe end is particularly striking for me. All those casualties listed... I can only imagine being In a jet above the big, endless blue, dangling from a chute not knowing how horrible of an end I will meet. At that point getting blown across the sky in pieces would be a more dignified end. I can't imagine the fear of drifting afloat in the water for days not knowing if anyone will ever come or being a sailor inside a sinking ship in the lower compartments without a way out. To think about how every one of those ships and planes had at least one poor bastard in them gives me a weird feeling, and certainly not a good one.
Ответить😂😂😂 zero bias here completely horse shit
Ответитьlol
Ответитьonly 3 escorts? even for strike groups traveling through greece, they can easily have 6 other ships along with 1 or more subs
ОтветитьDamn that was exciting, it seems that 2 carrier tasks forces should work together in the south China sea at all times.
ОтветитьI reckon the Seawolf simply existing would completely change the outcome from what was in this video
ОтветитьCan this be a video game
ОтветитьAll China needs to do is hold up a giant sign that says "there are only 2 genders" and they can destroy the US military without firing a shot.
ОтветитьThis seems to me the equivalent of chanting "USA! USA! USA!"
ОтветитьThe pl 12s being useless is completely unrealistic. They are not the state of the art, however they are still a very capable missle by all accounts.
ОтветитьI bet you this doesn't take in count that china is a paper army and there huge rocket force is a sham due to the fact china is corrupt to the core plus they've never been in a war and we all know meat wave tactics if you can call it that is a complete waste and seen as they want to emulate ruzzia they'll do exactly that
ОтветитьSomething tells me though that it’s too late for all the Chinese. F22 went rogue again and grounded their entire airforce before the situation.
ОтветитьLMAO how much did my dumbass government pays for this propaganda video for that "blameless mistake" comment
ОтветитьI believed this was real for 15 minutes haha
Ответитьok this is the type of simulation ik the military want to do is a lost and from that lost they need to see what shit can they do to improve for if its a real battle they are ready
ОтветитьAcecombat lore
ОтветитьGlory to the Peoples Republic of China
ОтветитьYou forgot one important fact, the fuel in chinas planes was replaced with water😂
ОтветитьThank you, regards. 335th FTS
ОтветитьWe will see how your video holds up in a few years. Hope you don’t have to eat bias crow.
ОтветитьNo war will occur between the US and China unless it is instigated by the US. And US will lose because it will be a defensive war for China. Nice fantasy scenario presentation though.
ОтветитьVery compelling video! If something like this did go down this way, the thing that should have the Chinese seriously worried is that they just sunk one carrier group. The US has TEN more and the ability to project power into every single corner of the globe. China cannot. So things would get very ugly for China, very fast.
ОтветитьAnti-ship missles came too late in the game. No submarine engaging in the fight. Little electronic warfare. Too big of a gap between 2 powers' missle technology and personnel capabilities.
ОтветитьYah but how many of the PRC missiles actually had fuel in them instead of water?
ОтветитьAs a Chinese, I can say there’s no way Chinese PLA could execute those tactics and utilized their weapons effectively. Because the chain of command is deeply corrupted and the weapons are not properly maintained, capabilities are inflated.
Ответитьi could see this kind of american aggression sparking a real conflict
Ответитьa super hornet callsign „mobius” „trigger” and „nemo”? I see what you did there
Ответитьthought this was real for a sec lol, good work
ОтветитьThe outcome would be different if the Chinese weren’t so close to their home turf, and the Us doesn’t plan to fight china there (hopefully we wont have to) they plan to fight it out in the high seas. And also don’t feel bad about this sim because this was an inaccurate carrier group, normally they have 1-2 anti air ships, 2 guided missile cruisers, and 1-2 anti submarine frigates/destroyers. And also usually a submarine escort and of 1-2 attack subs
ОтветитьAnd that’s just one lightly guarded carrier imagine all fleets with their respective protection fighting China. That would be crazy
ОтветитьJake Tran Castle
Ответитьgiven that a recent houthi missile came within one mile and had to be engaged by ciws tells us that our carrier strike groups and warships are actually extremely vulnerable to multiple incoming missiles.. now i wait for the armchair generals to tell me im wrong and that we can shoot down a million missiles well before ciws has no choice but save everyone's lives
ОтветитьCurrent SWO here. Lots of little inaccuracies but best you could do with solely unclassified information. Really great video man.
ОтветитьThought this was real what the fuck
Ответитьhey man, i really like your videos! the way i ran to your channel to see if there were any new updates to this was insane! please keep adding to the series, its absolutely amazing!
ОтветитьPart 2? Also what is the name of that sim?
ОтветитьNo U.S. submarine despite it being standard practice to have them with Carrier groups, AMRAAMs literally decimating everything they are fired at while PL-15 doesn't do shit... like, I enjoy watching this but it's just a bad video and a terrible estimation of reality.
Ответитьcallsign suggestion: unicorn
Ответить