How we found out evolution is true: John van Wyhe at TEDxNTU

Biological Evolution is a FACT. The Theory of Evolution is our explanation of that FACT.

The theory of evolution raises more questions than provides answers. Why are there still monkeys or apes if we evolved from them? wouldn't they all be extinct now after evolving into humans? why did they stop evolving? wouldn't there be some primate somewhere in the middle of its evolution process like half monkey and half man, or 80% monkey and 20% man. It just doesn't make sense. ..To me, it take more faith to believe in evolution than creation. It just doesn't add up.

We didn't find out that evolution is true, evolution is a farce, part of the reason that it is still referred to as the theory and not the fact of evolution.

It is a theory full of guesswork and speculation, that has been proven incorrect time and time again.
Not to mention the deception and lies that evolutionists have put forth in order to perpetuate their arguments.
It is not even possible for us theists to lie about proof like these monkey men do.

Doesnt the existence of aliens throw a bit of a spanner, or at least shift the goalposts a bit on the conventional evolution theory, did it work exactly the same on their planets, are they evolved from the big bang like us, fostered in environments perfectly suited to their genetic development, im not being either a smart a**e or bible basher, just wondering out loud so to speak.

Mathematical proof that the biblical flood was impossible
1. The radius of the earth = 6371 km, which means the volume of the earth is 1,083,206,916,846 cubic kilometers.
2. The height of Mount Everest is 8.85 km and this is where the water level has to rise to cover the earth.
3. Add the height of Mount Everest to the radius of the earth 6371 + 8.85 and re-compute the volume of the earth with the 8.8km water on top of it = 1,087,727,260,852 cubic kilometers.
4. Subtract the earth’s original volume from the computed volume yields 4,520,344,006 cubic kilometers, which is the volume of the water to cover all the mountains (or the flood).

5. The total amount of all the available water on earth before the flood (rivers, lakes and oceans) is measured to be 1,360,000,000 cubic kilometer, not including the water locked tightly in minerals and crystals (like wadsleyite and ringwoodite). The water in those minerals can only be freed by an incredible amount of energy. If this energy were to be released the earth’s temperature would rise to many thousands of degrees, and every living thing would be boiled in the steam to death.
The flood water is more than 3 times larger than all the waters available on the earth.

6. There is no explanation or possible place for this huge amount of water to go (it could not evaporate for a billion year or ever), the inside of the earth could not hold even 1% of this amount.
7. This incredible amount of water fell over the course of 40 days. So to raise the sea level 8.8 km in 40 days, the rainfall must be 8711 inches per day. The heaviest rainfall ever recorded was on Madagascar in the 1950’s where 73.6 inches of rain fell in a single day. So during the flood, each day more than 100 times more rain had to fall than the highest ever recorded on earth. This deluge is akin to putting a boat (Ark) under Niagara Falls.
8. Falling at the rate of 8711 inches per day, it would produce in incredibly high saturation of the air with moisture, which is impossible to breath.

THESE ARE JUST SOME OF THE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS OF THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE FLOOD, BUT THERE IS LOT MORE TO THIS FABLE (which I won’t go into at this time), just list a few:
1. There are geological and physical facts making the flood impossible.
2. There are historical proofs – several civilizations not recording any global floods
3. There are biological evidence against the possibility of the flood
4. I won’t even touch the ark and all the animals, which is a fairy tale and a biological impossibility.

There isn't evidence of the excavation of a SINGLE fossilized skeleton of a SINGLE dingo, kangaroo, kola, cassowary, echidna, kookaburra, or thylacinid within 8,000 km of Mt. Ararat. One would think SOME of those animals would have died on their way to or from the ark. Darwin knew why none were or ever would be discovered anywhere near Mt. Ararat.. "Evolutionists" know why none were or ever will be discovered, anywhere near Mt. Ararat. Creationists, because they play the game, "See no evilution, hear no evilution, speak no evilution," do not.

According to your YEC dogma, all animals were created at one time. Therefore the fossil record, to support your frairy tale of creationism, should show all animals present in the beginning. It does not. We see a slow progression of increasingly complex animals starting in the late pre-Cambrian and progressing through time to the present with modern animals only existing in the latest time frame, exactly as Evolutionary Theory would predict.
You, "fossil record proves creationism" is a lie.

No experiment has definitively proven a specific hypothesis regarding abiogenesis or the origin of life on Earth.

Globalist push payed for lie's

Wonderful proof of a common designer. 💯

The model that scientists believe using Evolution has been proven false by the fossil record.

ITS NOT TRUE!! IT DOES NOT PASS THE COMMON SENSE TEST. ONE SPECIES CANNOT EVOLVE INTO ANOTHER. BIRDBEAK SHAPES IS ONE THING BUT NEW SPECIES DO NOT EVOLVE FROM ANOTHER.

The only 'poo' is the theory of evolution.

Biological Evolution is an observed FACT. The Theory of Evolution is our explanation of that FACT.

Doctor Ross Geller

Biological Evolution is an observed FACT. The Theory of Evolution is our explanation of that FACT.

So the evidence is that we all have a common ancestor because the embryos of turtles, chickens, dogs, and humans look the same at a very early stage, and the wings of a bat and the fin of a whale look the same? Yeah no don't look at the DNA just look at the shape and you can clearly see we all must have a common ancestor! Rock solid evidence if you ask me!!

The reason we know that it's true is that there is not a single piece of evidence that refutes it and now DNA makes it beyond question! There are 13,000,000+ known species of which we are only one. We think that we are the only ones that are important. So called intelligent.

Hippo is the immediate ancestor of the whale. The whale with lungs had a land ancestor, which are extinct now. So this group is moving from land to water. Surely having lungs and coming up to the surface to respire, makes the whale the worst aquatic creature. In the next few thousand years, we would probably find whales having gills and living deep in the oceans. Wouldn't that be a reverse of what you have so eloquently named evolution?

Liar!

THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS COMPLETE NONSENSE

BUT THOSE WHO REJECT GOD ...THEY HAVE NOTHING ELSE

The "Debate" is over. Biological Evolution is science and has been accepted science for 150 years. Creationism is fraud, it is magic that has never been demonstrated and it has NO place in any science classroom.

God IS THE TRUTH. HE GAVE ME MY LIFE! HE GAVE ME MY TAILBONE!

GOD CREATED ALL SPECIES: "IN THE BEGINNING, GOD CREATED THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH." GENESIS 1:1. (KJV)

As science progresses, I believe Darwin's theory will fall apart.
The truth can be stanger the fiction.

Interesting perspective. I still give credit to God.

Evolution? I don't believe in that. God is fact, this is not.

All the things he mentioned about the fossils are explainable by a worldwide flood

The "Debate" is over. Biological Evolution is science and has been accepted science for 150 years. Creationism is fraud, it is magic that has never been demonstrated and it has NO place in any science classroom.

Creationism is a farce of lies, pseudoscience, liars and frauds. All of it is science denial and useless.

People who made up evolution did not study physics.

A creationist engineer, examining an airplane with thousands of parts that obviously NEVER functioned, will proclaim the plane to be a product of "intelligent design."

Why then does our genome contain more old dead genes and redundant copies of genes than it does active genes? Why do we share with chimps similar sets of these pseudogenes, with the same locations in the genome and most of the same errors in those pseudogenes if we did not come from a common ancestor?

I do not believe evelution is true read Genisis chapter 1-2

The Problem w/ Man, is that he thinks he Knows how things are Made.. due to the Idea that there is No Way there is a God or System that can Create Life out of Some Type of Will Power.. Yes, We Can See How Life Can Evolve.. But how is this the End of the Story... There were Extinctions of Dinosaurs several times.. & at the End of all Dinosaurs, What was the Real Reason they left the Earth..??? I bet there is an Answer all of these Question.. It is a Need to Know Basis & We don't need to Know,, Peace.

The PROOF that the Theory of Evolution is viable is the ability of the ToE to make verifiable predictions.
Darwin himself noted the similarities between theropod dinosaurs and birds and asserted that fossils would be found that show a mix of avian and theropod traits. 2 years later the first fossil of Archaeopteryx was found showing the imprints of feathers and a mix of avian and theropod traits but no skull. Darwin asserted that when another of this species were found, with a head, it would bear dinosaur like teeth and that was confirmed. This confirms that birds are a branch of dinosaurs and only an understanding of the ToE could have made this prediction.
The ToE was used to make a prediction and the prediction was verified.

We seen his Cladogram in Biolgy class today. His nodes are on point.

The "Debate" is over. Biological Evolution is science and has been accepted science for 150 years. Creationism is fraud, it is magic that has never been demonstrated and it has NO place in any science classroom.

Evolution is a lie!!

That's sheer denial of science. Not one experiment has ever been observed that supports any evolution. The fact is our world is not simple as they push that agenda. Just because it is called a theory does not make it science

There is nothing incompatible between the concepts of evolution and ID. Mockery is not an argument.

Too bad it's not true.

Evolution is a fact and Religion is not. Deal with it!

This guy could learn a lot by listening to Professor Walter Veith a creation scientist.

He just gave you a Jurassic Park Hollywood script. Even top secular scientists don’t believe this nonsense anymore. God alone created all things for His own glory. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1

Absolutely utter RUBBISH!!!

What a load of rubbish! The layers? Wisdom says layers are created when soil settles in water. In other words, there was a massive flood. Which all aspects of science have agreed on that there was a huge flood. Thankfully it is called Theory of evolution. A theory means an idea.

Not one, no not one evolutionist can win a debate against me, because evolutionists cannot debate, they have not evolved past the one brain cell phase of evolution. You people are pathetic. This is the acme of debate statement, 'You believe in talking snakes,' but I don't. Or 'you’re mean.' Not one of you could ever debate me, never. Dealing with a bunch of uncivilized, anti-intellectual, duncical group of human stains is funny LOL. Okay class let’s try this again, one more time without insults, or deflecting and playing the ostrich with your heads in the sand. These are easy questions for evolutionists, because they love science and logic which these questions are based upon. You the principles you claim to be part of evolution, but the principles you hate. Here we go boys and girls.

Please characterize the chemical processes which created the first self-replicating cell. I know this is abiogenesis and evolution does not encompass abiogenesis, yet the first self-replicating cell is necessary for the evolutionary process to begin. This is indeed science and logic which is presently being worked on by evolutionist, Dr. Lee Cronin et al, using state of the art technology.
Please characterize the chemical and biological processes which changed any species into a different species, it is your choice to choose. It is not enough to state these species demonstrate a commonality, but evolution must work through chemical and biological processes. Time and natural selection are not creative devices, to be more accurate time will destroy biological processes.
I realize these requests may be beyond your expertise, but you are allowed to use any source available in the entire universe. Surely with all of the evolutionary scientists with advanced honorifics the characterizations should be readily available.

Birds are descended from and are a living branch of dinosaurs. We have found many dinosaur fossils with the imprints of feathers preserved, even dinos that were too heavy to ever fly. Even the velociraptor of "Jurassic Park" fame has been shown to have the anchor points on the bone of its fore limbs of feathers indistinguishable from the same bumps found in eagles or geese. This case is further reinforced by the fact that chickens still have the DNA for a long bony tail like a dinosaur