Комментарии:
Man this is my first time that I watched one of your videos, Currently I am stuyding IR and I'd be great to me to listen you if you have podcast on Spotify or something like that
Ответитьyour viedo was very intersting and rich in knowledge why can't you make more
ОтветитьPlease provide us PDFs
ОтветитьConstructivism is USA is afraid of North Korea's Nuclear weapons and Not United kingdom's Nuclear weapons.
ОтветитьIf there is nothing natural about human practices, then the conventional tools of the natural sciences (e.g., math, scientific method) become irrelevant. Indeed, I question whether one can identify as a Political "Scientist" if one dispenses with the method.
Ответитьso handsome
ОтветитьThis is my layman view so please take it with a grain of salt. To me it seems constructivism augments and expends in liberalism it that's the concept that institutions, and belief systems can positively regulate an archaic system to the next logical level by including social norms, languages, and view the system itself as a artificial construct therefore malleable.
ОтветитьShort summary from the above video may help you to understand the main crux:
Constructivism is an international relations theory that focuses on the role of identities and social practices in the international system. It argues that states' interests and behavior are shaped by their identities, and that the meaning ascribed to concepts like anarchy or nuclear weapons can vary depending on the relationships between states. Constructivism provides an alternative lens for analyzing international affairs, emphasizing the importance of social interactions and ideas in addition to material factors.
"The state" is only an illusion we tolerate and take credence in when a self-described government is powerful and exercises effective monopoly of force. When armed militia groups, private corporations, or other combines exercise the greatest negotiating influence on a territory or an asset that is of interest to us, we deal with those entities and not with the self-designated "state".
ОтветитьI love the examples and how they explain in such an easy way. I’m not a native English speaker and I’ve been able to understand everything. Thank you guys for the hard work!! 🧡🧡
Ответитьbravo
Ответитьthanks for such an amazing and informative video seb!
ОтветитьIdeological difference
ОтветитьIt’s great contribution to assist
ОтветитьYour great men thanks for lecture
ОтветитьGod bless
ОтветитьDoes a state's identity reflects constructed international norms.
ОтветитьThis line of thinking can only really apply to hyper idealist nations like the Third Reich or Stalin's USSR, as the driving logic of these countries was their human (irrational) idealism rather than the objective forces of capital.
ОтветитьGREAT vid Sebastian! This was an excellent breakdown of Constructivism. My senior seminar research question started "What factors under..."; it would seem I am a Conventional Constructivist!
ОтветитьNow, back to my essay, which i have not started and i have about... 5 hours to make. Thanks.
Ответитьgracias, te amo💌
ОтветитьADA GAK YANG VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA.
ОтветитьDo you find constructivism a useful approach for thinking about world politics? Why, or why not?
Ответитьnice :)
ОтветитьWow what a powerful example when explaining amity and enmity amongst countries . That was a good one .
ОтветитьThanks a lot❤️
ОтветитьGreat info. Very helpful. What a hottie. 10/10 recommend watching this muted. XD
ОтветитьThank you:)
ОтветитьThank you so much for what you have done for IR students! Like your calm voice and clear logic. BRAVO!!!
ОтветитьCan't concentrate because He's so cute
ОтветитьHow would constructivist explains Russia's actions towards Ukraine?
ОтветитьI really need this, thank you!!!!!
ОтветитьInformative
ОтветитьSo when does international relations start considering domestic politics? That seems to me the most significant factor in international affairs.
ОтветитьThe meaning we ascribe to objects
Ответитьit was very clear and helpful! thanks
ОтветитьI'm watching this video because the lecturer at my university does a horrible job explaining constructivism. I did not understand one thing by watching his 21 minute video. This 11 minute video helped me understand constructivism. Thanks for posting!
ОтветитьThank you Seb, you touched up major points very intelligently :)
Ответитьthank you so much
ОтветитьYou have provided an amazing explanation. Thanks, IR Today and Sebastian!
ОтветитьGood Job,,
ОтветитьKindly provide pdf...if you can or anyone among those who have commented in this video
ОтветитьReally helpful for my essay on constructivism, thank you!!
ОтветитьWould you consider to go on a date?
ОтветитьHow can I focus on the lesson if he's super hot???
ОтветитьThank you
ОтветитьWhy this channel is not posting more videos 😭😭
ОтветитьThank so much - this was brilliant
Ответить