Atom wave functions (animation)

Atom wave functions (animation)

massimodipierro

14 лет назад

84,472 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@DeBaranquilla
@DeBaranquilla - 27.05.2013 00:22

WOW!!!!!!

Ответить
@HeyMedic
@HeyMedic - 08.06.2013 07:20

Amazing!

Ответить
@bios546
@bios546 - 21.02.2015 17:54

I FOUND YOU ATLAST WAVE FUNCTION!!!... this should've been in physics... but its begining in chem, then goes to phy. ... cooool!

Ответить
@AbsurdWaffleCamus
@AbsurdWaffleCamus - 31.03.2015 14:29

nice!

Ответить
@jake_runs_the_world
@jake_runs_the_world - 01.11.2015 07:07

This is Awesome!

Ответить
@albertkundrat9227
@albertkundrat9227 - 26.11.2015 00:09

Fundamentally illuminating!

Ответить
@parzios
@parzios - 24.03.2016 19:20

smoke weed every day

Ответить
@cardboardtenshi1008
@cardboardtenshi1008 - 07.04.2016 03:40

Nerdologia

Ответить
@VenkiNagaraj
@VenkiNagaraj - 02.12.2016 19:51

Helped me a lot,thank u

Ответить
@goodbyecruelworld8857
@goodbyecruelworld8857 - 03.12.2016 23:14

Thank you very much, this was incredibly helpful!

Ответить
@akyadott
@akyadott - 17.12.2016 14:20

helpful!

Ответить
@gauthamgopinath8481
@gauthamgopinath8481 - 05.02.2017 02:42

Could someone please help me identify the orbitals....I lost track after the second one when the flowery stuff kicked in.Would be a great help. :)

Ответить
@AliReza-cx7wg
@AliReza-cx7wg - 27.07.2017 17:30

this is wroooooong

Ответить
@YouJustCantCompare
@YouJustCantCompare - 14.08.2017 23:37

tell me thats not how our galaxy works

Ответить
@mahuubao
@mahuubao - 13.09.2017 12:50

excellent for visualization

Ответить
@danno1800
@danno1800 - 28.10.2017 03:03

Excellent! Thank you

Ответить
@piyushtiwari5422
@piyushtiwari5422 - 31.10.2017 22:18

Is it going through nuclei ?

Ответить
@snpio2811
@snpio2811 - 19.01.2018 00:52

Great animation. Would've been greater if you could express different phases in the motion with different colors. Anyway. Great! :)

Ответить
@mene2254
@mene2254 - 16.02.2018 21:20

Electron is not a particle, you should not imagine it like a motionless volume
or as a point, is a moving shape, and its motion has rhythm and symmetry, like
all the existing things in the universe. Talking about probability of found an
electron is wrong; the electron is the shape and its motion. That shape moves rhythmically
due to the lack of equilibrium between the positive and negative energy. Going
from opposite shapes of maximum potential to minimum, again and again, but
unable to escape one from each other. But a subtle imbalance in that precarious
equilibrium can make the dance to come to an end. The electron comes off and that
beautiful shape collapse on itself moving away from the atom.  Electron
is not a particle,, you should not imagine it like a motionles volumen or as a
point, is a moving shape, and its motion has rithm and simetry, like
all the existing things in the universe. Talking about probability of found an
electron is wrong, the electron is the shape and its motion. That shape
moves rithmicaly due to the lack of equilibrium between the postive and
negative energy. Going from oposite positions of máximum potential to mínimum,
again and again, but unable to escape one from each other.

Ответить
@probability_density
@probability_density - 03.03.2018 04:48

This video is incredibly misleading...

Ответить
@prabhatgaur1150
@prabhatgaur1150 - 19.05.2018 11:39

I've been watching this video since one year or so.. Can the motion be shown without the rotation of centre(nucleus) please?

Ответить
@BC-mg2yj
@BC-mg2yj - 02.08.2018 05:05

Awesome sauce!

Ответить
@frenzscivola3099
@frenzscivola3099 - 21.08.2018 12:45

this is: wrong, misleading, WRONG.
So wrong.

Ответить
@wildflower5576
@wildflower5576 - 08.09.2018 17:47

Wow!!..thanks a lot...

Ответить
@wildflower5576
@wildflower5576 - 10.09.2018 02:27

It's explain how a circular standing electron wave can gives an atomic orbital easily!!!

Ответить
@fotoschopro1230
@fotoschopro1230 - 04.10.2018 19:27

This depiction is wrong.

Ответить
@espinozaxd3790
@espinozaxd3790 - 29.11.2018 21:58

Rich pls give us an A

Ответить
@TheRainHarvester
@TheRainHarvester - 12.03.2019 21:07

I wonder if something like the primordial particle system can lead to electron behaviour. I'll reply with a video I made ( link)...

Ответить
@shreemegha6798
@shreemegha6798 - 07.06.2019 19:27

How an electron can pass through nucleus?????? Its a wrong concept

Ответить
@ther701
@ther701 - 29.08.2019 15:51

I was like waiting for all f orbitals

Ответить
@catherinejackson9924
@catherinejackson9924 - 08.02.2020 03:15

This might be a dumb question, but I have always wondered this. The p,d, and f orbitals are always shown as crossing into the nucleus area, what prevents the electrons from entering the nucleus at this point because the EM force is so much stronger than the weak force. Also, how do these orbitals maintain the quantum energy levels when they get so mixed up in space.

Ответить
@erkanmahmut1305
@erkanmahmut1305 - 26.04.2020 03:13

Just 1 lil mistake that elektrons dont touch proton nor other cloud

Ответить
@danielc5647
@danielc5647 - 06.05.2020 21:33

TOTALLY WRONG
electrons don't move on trajectories well known, they just have probability densities, wich are highest inside the shape of the "electron clouds" as a fundamental thing on quantum mechanics, they just don't behave the way we're used to objects to behave, and can't measure the position and momentun at the same time, and also those have a limit, those shapes, which you programmed with python need numerical ansylisis and the schrödinger equation, which i am pretty much sure you know, so i think you just were playing with the program, but for the people who think this is how atoms behave, well, it is more complicated, and also the shapes of d orbitals are only possible with multiple electrons so it can't be just a matter of an electron orbiting, which means angular acceleration, which means electromagnetic waves. and we don't have that, we just have probability densities of where it's the most possible the electron to be, which is nearest to the proton on the hydrogen atom for example

Ответить
@anuchinari7058
@anuchinari7058 - 27.07.2020 11:17

All this in positive orientation, p orbital have 3 orientations and d,f have different orientations I think in this video all the shapes of these orbitals are shown in a specific orientation

Ответить
@atulping4944
@atulping4944 - 10.10.2020 14:33

In this video electron really hit the nucleus , doesn't make any sense !

Ответить
@191246mann1
@191246mann1 - 25.10.2020 15:51

I understood the electron was 2000 times smaller than the proton and the orbit or orbital was a long way away .

Ответить
@youchris67
@youchris67 - 19.12.2020 07:16

In true scale--if that depicted nucleus were the actual size of the proton at the center of a hydrogen atom that you see here--the actual electron would be about 10 miles away! Atoms are mostly huge voids between objects just like our solar system.

Ответить
@izgit
@izgit - 01.01.2021 23:40

nobody:
electrons: 8

Ответить
@idreesibhai8056
@idreesibhai8056 - 06.01.2021 21:48

why electron of s not collide with electron of p orbital?

Ответить
@pamir8232
@pamir8232 - 16.02.2021 23:06

Nope, these aren't wave functions. These animations show as if the electron has a trajectory, which it doesn't, but if we were to think of each frame of the electron as a measurement done, then yeah, it would make sense since it would give a probability distribution. But wave function? Not even close to it. The whole point of a wave function(more specifically, the wave function squared) is that the electron is in a superposition of all the probabilities, so giving specific trajectory to the electron doesn't make sense. It isn't moving through the orbital, it is, in a way, the orbital itself(at least according to quantum mechanics) since it is at all of the probabilities given with the orbital at once.

Ответить
@azizfadli488
@azizfadli488 - 26.03.2021 16:41

Tank you

Ответить
@tryphonkorm
@tryphonkorm - 12.06.2021 02:39

I am not sure I understand. Is the electron jumping between orbitals?

Ответить
@nikitarangdal7039
@nikitarangdal7039 - 02.07.2021 16:52

Wow

Ответить
@alexmartincsek575
@alexmartincsek575 - 15.10.2021 13:09

me and the boyz watching DaAtomz spin

Ответить
@حنينمحمدابوخيزران
@حنينمحمدابوخيزران - 24.10.2021 20:47

Woow 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Ответить
@jesusamericohuari783
@jesusamericohuari783 - 10.04.2022 06:54

THIS is a WRONG model pf atom structure...please change your mind

Ответить
@adityabajad3254
@adityabajad3254 - 18.01.2023 15:34

Legends watching after 11 years

Ответить
@priyanshupritam6725
@priyanshupritam6725 - 02.03.2023 22:21

I think that this vdo is starting from n = 2 where standing wave forms by 2lambda , as the vdo starts electron is moving in 2s subshell later on on gaining energy it starts moving in 2p subshell then after I am not getting it . Whether I am thinking correct or wrong 🤔 help me

Ответить