Комментарии:
we need this for cs2
ОтветитьI cant wait for the day that noob nerds will no longer find the validation and excitement they cant get in both in game and in real life!! Woohooooo!!! Stay nerd and noobs looserss 😂😂😂
Ответитьi wasnt ready for the last itchy nipple though
ОтветитьThe reason why I avoid multiplayer fps games is that cheating is very rampant but after seeing this vid, it made me happy and excited for the future of gaming in general.
ОтветитьI don't think AI for Anti cheat can be good for every game. Halo infinite is a great example of why not. I think Call of Duty is another example of why. Some games I play absolutely dogshit and barely get any kills or score points. And other games are so far above my expected efficiency that an AI would think I was cheating. There's quite a few external cheats nowadays like AHK that are undetectable and use in game colors to + the ini file settings. Can't exactly scan a game for cheats that doesn't have anything attached to it, unless it were a program like vanguard, that valorant uses.
Ответить6 months later.. still nothing... :D
ОтветитьAbout 7-8 months ago I used a actual cheat like esp and aimbot and after sometime I used cheats like bullet track speed hack God view magic bullet but like a month ago I got a feeling like I don't just want to use them , I want to know how does these things actually worked . So now I started using cheat engine, ida pro , gg(gmaegarduian) and many more
Ответитьplease update
Ответитьupdate?
Ответитьok but why is the focus only on fps games? what about stuff like elden ring or dead by daylight which are just as worse if not even more, it shouldnt be just shooters that get this much attention but every type of online pvp game. how are they going to detect data in those games?
Ответитьwe all gonna die
ОтветитьAs a real gamer with a 20 year old steam account with zero bans, and growing up dealing with hackers all the way back to TWL, and Cal... I honestly LOVE the people working on this! Shroud your days are numbered, and you have 1000's of hours of hacking footage in PUBG you little rat, about damn time we drop the hammer on these shitloord streamers & hackers.
Ответить30% cheaters. That's enough to lose faith in humanity.
ОтветитьAbout time!
Ответить1/3 is a little much lol thats just not true
ОтветитьHi, is there an update on that topic? would like to hear that first fps games like pubg starting to implement it. are they in contact with popular dev's?
Ответитьdude the music is so loud GOD
ОтветитьObvious as fuck that it was husky. It's the only one that didn't move human.
ОтветитьSoooo 6 months later.... Cheating not solved, hello?
ОтветитьThe unique biometric profile thing is quite scary, as it can inevitably be linked to player accounts containing personal information. I’m sure then there will be people wanting to look at the gameplay of individuals to surmise behavioral characteristics. Like looking back at the GTA play of a tool schooter to determine if there are “red flags” that could then be used to identify others playing the game who show similar patterns.
The privacy concerns aside, this sounds like a great solution.
too bad this will never happen
ОтветитьWait until the "bio profile" generates false positives, and you'll have the biggest scandal of the last decade in the video gaming industry, bigger even than Unity's recent failure.
ОтветитьI don't understand though, how do I implement the AI-AC ? where could I get it from?
ОтветитьIve been saying they need to do this for sooooooo longgggg
Ответитьik that was orisis cheat
Ответитьso ? how is going this now ?
ОтветитьSeems like it would be very hard to differentiate between aim assist built into games and aim assist added in
ОтветитьThis is definitely going to happen at some point and it is going to be awesome
ОтветитьCatch all cheats? No, not at all. There is no way to end the cat-and-mouse game. Behavioral heuristic of many forms, including recent ones that use machine learning (Vacnet), have been used for at least a decade. Punkbuster for Battlefield tried to catch rage aimbots back in the day, and even in such a blatant way of cheating, cheat providers quickly created full on rage cheats that bypassed the heuristics.
What ends up happening is some talented programmer creates something that evades detection then sells it for a shit load of money. Or they are obsessive about cheating and make their own private hack that bypasses detection. And then they sometimes turn it into a business to make a shit load of money.
As another example of this type of bypassing, Vacnet, after an update, starts at about 100% detection for all rage hackers (like instantly snapping and flipping around, killing everyone in 3 seconds with 180 degree turns). In a talk given by one of the creators of Vacnet, they admit they eventually end up catching only about 85-95% of rage hackers due to the cat-and-mouse nature of cheating. Keep in mind that Vacnet uses the same kind of technology as chatGPT and Alpha Zero (the AI chess engine). It is not chump, and it's made by Valve, which is harder to get into for employment than Google. And even they cannot detect 100% of totally blatant rage cheaters let alone subtle aimbots. And they're analyzing every piece of server data available rather than just a video of gameplay.
There's no reason to market in such a dishonest fashion. If I'm being charitable, maybe you're a layman and just don't know this, and they told you otherwise. It's just not possible unfortunately. I'm all for AI-based anticheats since it will catch a lot of unsophisticated cheaters and reduce cheating overall, but do not claim it will end the cat-and-mouse game between anticheat and cheat developers.
And there is no way any mainstream game is going to use "biometric" detection. Are you thinking xbox will start shipping with a heart monitor and a bunch of sensors? Come on... there is enough controversy around having an invasive software anticheat. Companies are not going to put barriers in place that stop a large chunk of their market from buying their game. What we need is for governments to make laws that criminalize cheating in video games and then to hunt cheat creators on legal grounds, moving all of their kind off the clear net and onto the dark net. And we need companies to mirror Riot by making invasive anticheats. And we also need sophisticated, AI-based heuristics to detect the majority of the most blatant of cheaters. Seriously, write to your senators and whatnot. Cheating should be illegal, and it would be great if countries helped each other in catching the cheat manufacturers rather than the cheaters themselves.
This is too good to be true. I'll believe when i see it. I hope to god its true though.
ОтветитьIm about halfway through and my first thought is what if you have a neurodivergent individual whose in game actions are way outside the norm of human behavior. Banned lol
ОтветитьAn AI will never be able to distinguish a good ESPer from a legit player.
ОтветитьJust taking a second to appreciate Nick's writing... the beginning and the end of this video tie up so smoothly and it's so funny 😂
ОтветитьOh good, more ways for big companies to stalk us with computers.
Ответить+1
ОтветитьWait so lets say a friend of mine has a "bio-metric profile" that is banned. Then he comes over to my place and plays on my account. Does that mean my account will be banned? Can someone with a banned "bio-metric profile" just go around getting anyone banned if they have access to someone else account?
ОтветитьSo... any news? This whole thing kinda just disappeared within a few weeks and nothing new has come out. Was it a joke or a publicity stunt or something? Not to mention, the idea is still pretty absurd
ОтветитьI dont care if this thing gonna make people concerns about they safety cuz i getting tired being paranoid when play multiplayer game
Im pretty sure people have same this feeling when boot up or play pvp games
50% he good a camper or smurf
50% he are a cheater
Even if we could eliminated half of it its good to make you feel reasure and could enjoy the game even you are lose
I believe that Valve will glad to use it when this AI Anti-Cheat releases.
Ответитьwow this is even worse than kernel driver anti-cheat
Ответитьi dont think Devs intentionally let cheaters ruin the game for small amounts of the playerbase to keep buying accounts. In the case of tarkov i doubt most cheaters are buying accounts from BSG compared to stolen accounts online for a fraction of the price so a lot of the time BSG isnt making money anyway. Also the amount of positive attention something like this would garner in pretty much any FPS outweighs any potential gain from players that are harming your brand daily and by consequence killing your game.
Ответитьthis would be a great NSA tracking tool but if it was used for accounts (gmail, microsoft, reddit, twitter) to make sure a particular person doesnt have a use on that platform no matter what
ОтветитьIm so hard right now, i need ETA ON THIS!!!!!!!!
ОтветитьPeople won't play if they can't cheat.
Ответитьcheating should become an impressionable offence, minimum 5 year sentence, problem would be gone overnight.
ОтветитьWhat about false bans? Caused by the ai being to sensitive to certain things you get a couple lucky shots with high fps and good reaction time and its a permaban or would it be more on how frequently you get those luck shots
ОтветитьNaw my nipples aren't getting itchy... Only r****ds will get caught by this
Ответить