The IPCC mitigation report explained in less than 8 minutes feat. @ClimateAdam

The IPCC mitigation report explained in less than 8 minutes feat. @ClimateAdam

zentouro

2 года назад

72,041 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются

17+4=


Комментарии:

@mik13ST
@mik13ST - 03.08.2021 20:32

A bit off topic but what is the meaning of "panel" in the IPCC acronym? I am not native English speaker and it's not obvious. Also, it won't be obvious to local people when I explain the acronym.

Ответить
@KatrinaEames
@KatrinaEames - 03.08.2021 20:43

I didn't even realize it was time for another IPCC report - thanks for the update & breakdown of what to expect

Ответить
@ofentsewenalesego822
@ofentsewenalesego822 - 03.08.2021 20:54

Hey bro. Maybe you could also create a video on how we can learn to comprehend these kind of reports. In most cases, we get to take people's word instead of discerning the essence of the reports themselves.

Looking forward to the summary though. Great work!

Ответить
@EternalFringeDweller
@EternalFringeDweller - 03.08.2021 22:26

Thanks for the info. Forlorn request: Would you please not include background music in future presentations?

Ответить
@michaelbyrd7883
@michaelbyrd7883 - 03.08.2021 23:43

I've always been very angry with deforestation and clear cutting but I guess Greta was the first one to really bring me on board with the climate and climate science. I never heard of the IPCC until I heard her constantly talking about them. In fact I had no idea there was anything more then maybe Sierra club and friends of the earth etc. I knew about David Suzuki and Attenborough but I had never heard of a climatologists, just a meteorologist. Adam, you're awesome keep spreading the information, we need to get hip to it. Man, I hope Greta goes to the COP, I think Biden is doling out vaccines around the world so she'll rethink her decision. She's connected the way no one else has been able to and it's really important she's there.

Ответить
@narvuntien
@narvuntien - 04.08.2021 08:00

YAY! finally some light reading :P. But I am going to enjoy having even better graphs and statements to show why deniers are wrong more clearly

Ответить
@MrThelemonrose
@MrThelemonrose - 04.08.2021 09:55

Hiya! Thank you for another informative video. I didn't completely understand what ipcc meant and I also didn't know they were split into 3 sections! I will be sure to read them all when they come out

Thank you for still making videos!

Ответить
@MrThelemonrose
@MrThelemonrose - 04.08.2021 09:57

Also, I find your choice of music soothing and I think the volume level is perfect so I can focus on your voice but there's also something there in the background to fill it out. ALSO I think blue suits you very well 😊 I hope you have a lovely day!

Ответить
@Cedders001
@Cedders001 - 04.08.2021 20:32

Good explanation. I'm looking forward to report release on Monday 9th and meaning to blog about it.

There will be new stuff about attribution of extreme events. Doubt sea-level predictions will have changed much since SROCC in 2019.

If you want something to bet on, will climate sensitivity range be narrower than 2-4.5 °C? I'll stick my neck out and say yes, at least a more precise range will be quoted.

And will you update your fingernail colour depending on whether it's good or bad news? If you've ever mentioned nail colour, it's not on one of the majority of videos I've missed...

Ответить
@ukmjenkins
@ukmjenkins - 06.08.2021 20:28

'Human induced emissions of greenhouse gases', translates as,
The World Population Demand for Carbon Energy,
causes, The Magnitude of The World Carbon Energy Economy,
and causes, The Magnitude of World Carbon Dioxide Emissions.

The Urgent Need, to reduce The Cause of World Carbon Dioxide Emissions,
is The Urgent Need, to reduce The World Population Demand for Carbon Energy.

Ответить
@Sivah_Akash
@Sivah_Akash - 07.08.2021 05:23

As someone who has had difficulty reading even the Summary report of AR5, hearing that Adam will summarize the new reports in his videos makes me happy! :)

Ответить
@danzel1157
@danzel1157 - 07.08.2021 12:55

Thanks, Adam. I came here off the back of the skeptical science website. You are doing such great work.

Ответить
@nicholaspalmer2220
@nicholaspalmer2220 - 07.08.2021 18:47

Actually, that was probably the clearest explanation of what the IPCC is and isn't - by a long chalk - that I've ever seen. I don't suppose the usual 'it's all a plot by Maurice Strong and the UN to bring in a one world government' suspects will change their minds though...

Ответить
@QuintenCoret
@QuintenCoret - 07.08.2021 22:38

Ignoring the whole life-threatening crisis thing, it's just so cool to see hundreds of scientists representing all countries write thousands of pages about the current scientific consensus. Thanks for the explainer!

Ответить
@ali-8835
@ali-8835 - 08.08.2021 10:02

Ok, first shouldn't be intervened by (policy-maker) as it has to be pure since based. Once the policymaker had a touch on it, basically reflects its credibility, integrity, and transparency. Second, it's all about scenarios and literature generated by models, and for sure the outcomes are based on the lack/filtered/picked data. in another word, outcomes/ predictions are driven by political directions for their own interest. Most importantly, ask a question, who finances IPCC!!! ; well whoever is/ are financing IPCC has/have the most control over its outcomes :); nobody does such intensive work for a free dude.

looking forward to hearing your feedback on Aug 9th

Ответить
@nathansurrett2088
@nathansurrett2088 - 08.08.2021 11:16

Don't forget, when you are shocked and upset while reading the report, this was intentional. Corporations and Governments knew the damage being done. This is not our individual responsibility to fix, that would be successful gaslighting if we thought it was all our fault. There are key players that must carry the weight and we must make them. Sure, we didn't create this problem, but our generation must solve it. That's just our Zeitgeist.

Ответить
@agamazurek9592
@agamazurek9592 - 09.08.2021 10:24

Thanks for this video! I'm now writing my master's thesis on adaptation to climate change of Warsaw so I can't wait for this report too :D

Ответить
@YuChiGongG
@YuChiGongG - 09.08.2021 13:47

Why do these reports include a disclaimer stating that projections of changes such as sea level do NOT include or add into the projections important contributions from methane, melting permafrost, tundra, etc? Also, in addition to your stationary bicycle, do you have a bicycle that will travel places?

Ответить
@ConfidentlyUninformed
@ConfidentlyUninformed - 09.08.2021 15:12

It would also make no sense for them (IPCC scientists) to be in a conspiracy with governments, they’re scientifically cleaning the clock of governments’ and their lack of climate action.

Ответить
@pennyquilter592
@pennyquilter592 - 09.08.2021 17:22

Really helpful

Ответить
@SonLe-gh3dz
@SonLe-gh3dz - 09.08.2021 20:35

This year ipcc report if going to be stark

Ответить
@simonabunker
@simonabunker - 10.08.2021 16:39

"clean coal rules" - that must have been Australia!

Ответить
@petermathieson5692
@petermathieson5692 - 11.08.2021 06:49

Panic much? Greta would be so pleased by your hysteria.

Ответить
@metallicsavage788
@metallicsavage788 - 11.08.2021 11:32

Check out the track 'Killing The World' by Talion on my channel. Its lyrical message is even more relevant now than when it was first released. Please comment like and share. When will mankind heed the warnings...

Ответить
@rui4762
@rui4762 - 11.08.2021 11:38

Even without a scientific report I can feel how the ecosystem is influenced badly by the rampant natrual destruction and rampant commercialization.

To a degree that the coronavirus outbreak, the mice plague outbreak,the flood,forest fires and all sorts of "natural"disasters happened.

Ответить
@johnwysowski8578
@johnwysowski8578 - 12.08.2021 03:50

IPPC report approved by 195 governments, I sure it's completely unbiased. Of course all the specialists are not influenced by the governments who own the reports. Sure, governments just have to sign off on the reports and can't object to findings. Go against your government, kiss your career goodby.

Ответить
@KarolaTea
@KarolaTea - 16.08.2021 22:04

Thanks for explaining that!

Ответить
@richdiana3663
@richdiana3663 - 17.08.2021 23:45

IPCC reports have always been watered down by corporate editing. This no longer works because the crisis has arrived. Prepare for the unpreparable.

Ответить
@andiannisa19
@andiannisa19 - 18.08.2021 18:24

Hi Adam, thanks for making IPCC more understandable! I'm an undergraduate student and would like to make a video explaining about climate in my native language. Would you mind if I use your video as a reference? Thanks! :)

Ответить
@avaevathornton9851
@avaevathornton9851 - 03.09.2021 08:39

That 95% figure sounds really low to me.

Ответить
@pseudonamed
@pseudonamed - 21.10.2021 15:48

Thanks for giving a basic overview of how the IPCC works

Ответить
@winstonsolipsist1741
@winstonsolipsist1741 - 09.04.2022 21:05

Please say you are wearing eco-friendly polish for the nails.

Ответить
@substance313
@substance313 - 14.04.2022 06:46

Thank you for this! Such a great effort here, engaging and humorous, subscribed immediately!

Ответить
@DURGADEVII
@DURGADEVII - 05.07.2022 16:34

your nail paint is turquoise or just ocean blue .

Ответить
@melissawalsh4394
@melissawalsh4394 - 15.09.2022 18:59

Thank you for taking the time to produce this video. Great explanation and entertaining at the same time.

Ответить
@mikedreasky8400
@mikedreasky8400 - 03.10.2022 19:54

I hope someday you realize how wrong you are. it's absolutely unbelievable how people can be drawn to this BS.

Ответить
@brianletter3545
@brianletter3545 - 20.01.2023 19:10

Pay peanuts - get monkeys!

Ответить
@brianletter3545
@brianletter3545 - 20.01.2023 19:15

Are there any disputes about the IPCC science?
I mean - is any of it disputed?
If so, where are the disputes mentioned or recorded?

Ответить
@kimlibera663
@kimlibera663 - 21.02.2023 23:42

Would you guys get over yourselves. IPCC is junk-its a political body. Do you want them to change your diaper too? Many scientists quit them. Their scheme is all about redistribution of income.

Ответить
@dragonpundit.6443
@dragonpundit.6443 - 10.07.2023 01:30

Answer: It isn't important to anyone but fraudulent researchers.

Ответить
@Kintabl
@Kintabl - 12.09.2023 10:33

Thery are not. It's bunch of BS that has nothing to do with reality.

Ответить
@nazliturini9269
@nazliturini9269 - 26.04.2024 16:42

Perfect. I am happy findinh you

Ответить
@rodmartin-nl8ns
@rodmartin-nl8ns - 22.08.2024 09:24

How come any report supporting climate change is natural are not accepted
Does not happen?
Remember the emails that went to wrong address!!!
Yer thought you would forget
If it happened once it would of happened more to the right address ok

Ответить
@HuwRees
@HuwRees - 14.12.2024 22:47

This is tragic 😂

Ответить
@subimaginos
@subimaginos - 22.01.2025 21:59

IPCC does not conduct their own research, they just "curate" (cherry pick) others.
IPCC members are politically selected (they are an echo-chamber and do not tolerate opinions).
IPCC should be dissolved.

Ответить