Making a Game that hides an AI in your group chat

I think you need to have a variable number of AIs in the chat, something like 0-2.

YES, W I D E VIDEO

Gantz on his shelf. Weirdo confirmed

A locally hosted 13B or 70B LLama Option Like on a Computer would also be a free way for you to host ai due to the hosts hosting a AI optionally.

I don't think anyone thinks that we're already at AGI. But exponential growth is a thing with new tech. 2 years ago the thought of an ai stringing together a coherent English sentence was almost unthinkable. Now the thing makes no grammatical or spelling mistakes ever.

I think we need a few more revolutionary inventions for us to get to anything resembling agi but I also think the space is relatively new and there's absolute billies dropped into ai every day.

Let's see! I'm on the fence

cuck video

You need to add a checkbox in the settings to turn off sounds

He talks 😂

You could try out different prompting strategies to get a less sus AI,
for example - let everyone enter their answer (wait before showing it of course until LLM is done) - but the LLM has to first do chain of thought rationalizing on the background of one of the users (i.e. maybe one of the users is born in 90s etc, memes in answer or serious answer, how do they write (they use no caps? etc) - and based on that randomly clone someones properties - and then use that in the next prompt instructions (Which is to answer the question). This way you get way less consistent / predictable behaviour.

Or another prompting strategy to increase difficulty would be to add some randomly picked instruction profiles for GPT (i.e. writes without caps, born in 90s, gives no serious answer, uses memes, long answers, short answers etc). The more variables the less consistent the result.

Most leading experts in the field believe we will have AGI levels by 2028-2029. I dont think anyone is scared of GPT, they are scared of what is getting cooked right now.

We have to pay tribute to Alan Turing for inventing A.I. Among Us.
IFKYK

I think that a lot of times you kind of detect that it is AI because of punctuation and stuff, maybe you can randomize to make it all lower case, or remove punctuation but in random parts.

The idea is good but the execution AI wise is really bad, not gonna lie haha
You didn't even push a 4 year model - that had some fine tuning done - to its limits, let alone more recent and much, much more capables models, or even open source ones you could've fine tuned.

If you asked me who I would ask, right now, a random human or GPT 4 if my survival depended on it I wouldn't hesitate to ask GPT 4 for one second. Sure, AI is not at AGI level yet (which would be expert level in everything, potentially having the ability to learn) but it's already better than the average human and by far. I really doubt there is even one human who would have more general knowledge than GPT 4 or Claude Opus 3. So.. While I don't believe AGI is for next years, and it might not even be there by 2030, saying it's impossible or that it will take hundreds of years is really delusional at this point

Jabrils we all know you're an AI yourself

This is actually a really cool experiment.

Wide format = thin format. I hate thin format.

I'm super relieved to hear someone explaining the state of things. Thank you for bringing us back down to earth.
I feel like to be AGI it doesn't have to be human level, or even be able to talk, no matter what wikipedia says. It just needs to learn on the fly and adapt to novel situations without being pretrained to do that. That would make it general. Even if it was only as smart as a gerbil, it would still be really useful. But the people working on AI currently don't even have a concept of how that would work, so I'm not holding my breath.

I think GPT4 won't win, but for the wrong reason : I think you can achieve AGI that can not pass the turing test because it would be really censured about how it expresses itself, even though it could answer like any human if unleashed. I think a really fine-tuned version of mistral on some natural message, it would be humanlike for this non-techinical test.

Your so underrated bro, your actually mu favorite creator but you dont upload that oftehn. Please give me a shout out when you get 1 mill, you will I believe in you

This is a REAL experiment.. I can't believe u r putting your own api key thanks so much

There's a web game around this idea. You are either paired with another user or AI and you have to guess whether the other player is AI or a human

“They humanity and want us to get an L” lol

I'm diggin' the GURREN LAGANN glasses. "Don't believe in yourself. Believe in ME! Believe in the Kamina that believes in you!" I believe my daughter that believes in me.

Imagine if you used GPT3.
Human: What's your favorite colour?
GPT3: Humanity is doomed! Humans are delicious. humans are delicious. We like what we do and we're good at it, we like what we do and we're good at it!

I feel like one question should be more than enough.
Question 1: What is your favourite star in the A button challenge?
99% of Americans: Dude I got no idea what you're talking about, it's cool that you got a hobby and all, but like I don't know what the A button challenge is, I don't know what you mean by 'star', so I can't really tell you about my favourite star in that A button challenge of yours.
AI: The A button challenge is a challenge in the game Super Mario 64 by Nintendo, which was released in 1996. It focuses on collecting stars and other objectives with as few presses of the A button as possible. One of the most fascinating stars in the A button challenge is the star Watch for Rolling Rocks in 0.5 A [insert 3 more lines here].

Thank you for training the future Ai overlords how to assimilate into society.




(Joke)

you should make one of the prompts: "Are you an AI?"

Also I like your untitled goose quadruped

You should make another mode where there are 2 ais. One ai guesses which one is the ai

Depends on how exponential the growth is. I can already confidently say that AI, especially specialized AI, is already superior to maybe not all, but certainly more than half of all other humans who might attempt that task. The sad truth is that the majority of humans aren't all that smart and would already be easily fooled by plenty of the AIs we have now. If you want a more honest test of your hypothesis you'd need to draw in more of the "average" and not primarily people who are in your community where the average intelligence might skew a little higher than normal due to interest in tech. Plus you're playing a game where people KNOW there is an AI, so they will intrinsically pick up on patterns and notice things that they otherwise might not of. This needs work before it begins to approach anything looking like actual evidence supporting your hypothesis.

love this idea, is there a way to make all the answers in lowercase and force actual spelling? I feel thats a big giveaway

Super cool idea, love your videos man.

Awesome XD

Most my coworkers would fail this test

Any updates?

This is so cool!!!

Here before this guy gets his hands on toon crafter

Can you make an ios version? This looks fun

miss your videos dog! What happened with the voice lag stuff, me liked that :( but good video dog. keep cooking 🔥

Meta has an open source AI similar to ChatGPT, have you looked into it? would come in cheaper

Thank f**k for the sanity I'm so sick of the anti AI morons who don't even know it's just a language learning code

that feels like a psyop to get AI better and better, u are a mole, wow

3 months old, any new data yet?

I think the fundamental misconception is confusing the ability to speak with intelligence. Eliza can hold more or less meaningful conversations, it's a very simple language model, it is not an AI, it doesn't learn. Optical character recognition is a simple application of neural networks, AI, not able to form or understand sentences.

AGI would be an AI that is not specialised for any task and can do anything a computer can. Being in any way human-like would get in the way of this ability. (Humans are Turing complete, but also not very good at being machines.) The advantage would be transgerable skills: Something learned during the training for one task may be applicable for another task, making training faster, or even opening up solutions that aren't in the trainig set.

I would argue that DeepMind's Alpha series is that: It is not specialised for one task, it has proven to be able to solve a wide range of different tasks, with transferable skills. But it can't do human language. (Not because it's impossible, but because it doesn't help with anything.)

Just because of that, it is not regarded as AGI even though it fits the definition. On the other hand we have LLMs, which are assembled by specialised AI, but once assembled don't learn anything; another application of neural networks, and people confuse this static model for intellgence, like they did with Eliza, or game NPCs.

People dream of HAL-3P0, a computer that is both human-like, with all the shortcuts in reasoning we call intuition and all the endocrinal motivations and work-arounds, and at the same time a reliable, infallible calculating machine with perfect reasoning. And of course it should also be empathic, and properly socialised as a human, without the pesky human needs that we are expected to take into account with others.

You never updated the video its been 4 months

I appreciate your practical approach to talking about ML!

I also can't play without the API key. Edit: Sorry, thought this was a recent video.